Teams

VALLEY VISTA RC/VVRC COURTS S70W6.0A

2025 ADULT 70&Over · Women 6.0

10 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-12-11vs GREEN VALLEY CC S70W6.0ASplit 11
L#1 DoublesChristine Rosi / Sally van Oosbree vs Yolanda Irigon / Terry Christophel3-6, 7-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesVivian Flint / Anita Roth vs Laura Fowler / Amy Shively6-2, 1-6, 1-0
2025-12-11vs NAPA VALLEY TC/VINTAGE HS S70W6.0ASplit 11
L#1 DoublesBuffy Tang / Linda Heinz vs Barbara Lum / Virginia Pflueger2-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesChristine Rosi / Anita Lifson vs Margaret Angelovich / Catherine Hoffman6-2, 2-6, 1-0
2025-12-10vs GREEN VALLEY CC S70W6.0AWon 21
L#1 DoublesAnna Silva / Buffy Tang vs Carole Tarantino / Carol Kim6-2, 2-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesAnita Lifson / Linda Heinz vs Amy Shively / Laura Fowler6-4, 6-1
W#3 DoublesVivian Flint / Anita Roth vs Catalina Barajas / Lis MacDonald7-6, 3-6, 1-0
2025-12-09vs NAPA VALLEY TC/VINTAGE HS S70W6.0ALost 12
L#1 DoublesAnna Silva / Christine Rosi vs Margaret Angelovich / Natasha Krol Mantle4-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesSally van Oosbree / Buffy Tang vs Barbara Lum / Virginia Pflueger2-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesLinda Heinz / Anita Lifson vs Susan Kramer / Catherine Hoffman6-2, 4-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 6.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.68 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.20
Dolores Schmidt
published 3.5
2.87
Marilyn Scully
published
2.79
Buffy Tang
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.77
Anita Lifson
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.66
Christine Rosi
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.62
Anna Silva
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
1.85
Anita Roth
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
Linda Heinz
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Sally van Oosbree
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Vivian Flint
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Anna Silva + Christine Rosi123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Dolores Schmidt
7W–15L career · no lines in 2025
6%93%1%
3.20
Marilyn Scully
5W–6L career · no lines in 2025
<1%84%16%
2.87
3
Buffy Tang
1W–7L career · type A · 3 lines in 2025
1%94%5%
2.79
3
Anita Lifson
6W–1L career · type M · 3 lines in 2025
2%94%4%
2.77
3
Christine Rosi
3W–7L career · type S · 3 lines in 2025
11%89%<1%
2.66
3
Anna Silva
4W–11L career · type S · 2 lines in 2025
18%82%<1%
2.62
2.5
Anita Roth
2W–3L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
1.85
Linda Heinz
2W–1L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Sally van Oosbree
1W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Vivian Flint
2W–3L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.