Teams

GREEN VALLEY CC S70W6.0A

2025 ADULT 70&Over · Women 6.0

8 players · average NTRP 2.88 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-12-11vs VALLEY VISTA RC/VVRC COURTS S70W6.0ASplit 11
W#1 DoublesYolanda Irigon / Terry Christophel vs Christine Rosi / Sally van Oosbree6-3, 6-7, 1-0
L#2 DoublesLaura Fowler / Amy Shively vs Vivian Flint / Anita Roth6-2, 1-6, 1-0
2025-12-10vs NAPA VALLEY TC/VINTAGE HS S70W6.0ALost 12
W#1 DoublesTerry Christophel / Yolanda Irigon vs Margaret Angelovich / Natasha Krol Mantle2-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 DoublesCarole Tarantino / Lis MacDonald vs Virginia Pflueger / Barbara Lum2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesAmy Shively / Laura Fowler vs Susan Kramer / Catherine Hoffman3-6, 2-6
W#1 DoublesCarole Tarantino / Carol Kim vs Anna Silva / Buffy Tang2-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 DoublesAmy Shively / Laura Fowler vs Anita Lifson / Linda Heinz4-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesCatalina Barajas / Lis MacDonald vs Vivian Flint / Anita Roth6-7, 6-3, 0-1
2025-12-09vs NAPA VALLEY TC/VINTAGE HS S70W6.0ALost 12
L#1 DoublesTerry Christophel / Yolanda Irigon vs Margaret Angelovich / Natasha Krol Mantle2-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesLis MacDonald / Carol Kim vs Barbara Lum / Virginia Pflueger2-6, 6-7
W#3 DoublesCarole Tarantino / Catalina Barajas vs Catherine Hoffman / Susan Kramer6-0, 7-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 6.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.63 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.79
Yolanda Irigon
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.76
Carole Tarantino
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
Amy Shively
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.72
Carol Kim
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.65
Terry Christophel
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.25
Catalina Barajas
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Laura Fowler
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Lis MacDonald
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Terry Christophel + Yolanda Irigon224 matchesnot enough data
Carole Tarantino + Carol Kim123 matchesnot enough data
Laura Fowler + Amy Shively033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Yolanda Irigon
20W–14L career · 3 lines in 2025
2%91%7%
2.79
3
Carole Tarantino
8W–15L career · 3 lines in 2025
3%93%4%
2.76
3
Amy Shively
0W–3L career · type S · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
3
Carol Kim
9W–21L career · 2 lines in 2025
6%92%2%
2.72
Terry Christophel
8W–11L career · 3 lines in 2025
99%1%<1%
2.65
2.5
Catalina Barajas
3W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%97%3%
2.25
Laura Fowler
2W–7L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Lis MacDonald
0W–5L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.