Teams

A55 6.0M TP1 Pozza

2024 NEOTA Adult 55 & Over Summer · NEOTA A55&O 6.0 Men Summer

10 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTHEASTERN OHIO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-07-24vs A55 6.0M AO MacfarlaneWon 21
W#1 DoublesTom Pozza / Brian Lambright vs Rick Baker / Jeff Myers4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesVince Cheverine / Ron Novak vs Greg Matzinger / Brian Chambers6-3, 6-4
L#3 DoublesChristopher Peters / Mark Robeson vs John Finucane / Sean Curtin1-6, 2-6
2024-07-17vs A55 6.0M TP2 SchulteWon 20
W#1 DoublesTom Pozza / Brian Lambright vs James Schulte / James Taylor3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJeff Belton / John Ragner vs Troy Smith / Rick Cunat3-6, 6-2, 1-0
2024-07-10vs A55 6.0M PW LongoriaWon 21
W#1 DoublesTom Pozza / Brian Lambright vs Ronald Longoria / Richard Lancaster6-1, 6-2
L#2 DoublesWilliam Fox / Ron Novak vs Gary Montgomery / Paul Sutor7-5, 1-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesVince Cheverine / Mark Robeson vs John Shami / Daniel Lachowyn7-5, 6-2
2024-06-26vs OH NEO A55 6.0M CortsLost 12
L#1 DoublesBrian Lambright / David Cutler vs David Andrews / Ben Zagorski4-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesWilliam Fox / Tom Pozza vs Robert Corts / James Wang3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJeff Belton / Christopher Peters vs Michael Boukzam / Robert Rosenau7-6, 4-6, 1-0
2024-06-12vs A55 6.0M AO MacfarlaneWon 21
W#1 DoublesBrian Lambright / David Cutler vs James Sweeney / Greg Matzinger6-1, 6-1
L#2 DoublesRon Novak / Mark Robeson vs Fernando Bertero / John Finucane5-7, 1-6
W#3 DoublesJohn Ragner / Jeff Belton vs Jeff Myers / Tom Mullee6-2, 6-4
2024-06-05vs A55 6.0M TP2 SchulteWon 21
W#1 DoublesTom Pozza / Brian Lambright vs Stephen Wilt / Jeff Scafaro6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesWilliam Fox / Ron Novak vs Michael Kramer / Chris Was6-4, 6-2
L#3 DoublesJeff Belton / Vince Cheverine vs Troy Smith / James Taylor2-6, 1-6
2024-05-29vs A55 6.0M PW LongoriaWon 21
W#1 DoublesTom Pozza / Brian Lambright vs Gary Montgomery / Paul Sutor6-4, 6-0
L#2 DoublesDavid Cutler / Ron Novak vs Richard Lancaster / Steve Hoelzer4-6, 5-7
W#3 DoublesVince Cheverine / Christopher Peters vs John Shami / Robert Barker6-1, 7-6
2024-05-22vs OH NEO A55 6.0M CortsLost 12
W#1 DoublesTom Pozza / Brian Lambright vs David Andrews / Ben Zagorski2-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesWilliam Fox / Vince Cheverine vs Robert Corts / James Wang2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesJohn Ragner / Christopher Peters vs Robert Rosenau / Michael Boukzam3-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings5 teams · NEOTA A55&O 6.0 Men Summer
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1OH NEO A55 6.0M Corts8019512144
2A55 6.0M TP1 Pozza6215923203
3A55 6.0M AO Macfarlane35101434239
4A55 6.0M PW Longoria2681637270
5A55 6.0M TP2 Schulte1781634224

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.70 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.93
Jeff Belton
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.82
Tavi Muresan
published
2.78
Ron Novak
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.77
Brian Lambright
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.70
John Ragner
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.63
David Cutler
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.50
Mark Robeson
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.49
Vince Cheverine
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
Rich Herbruck
published
Tom Pozza
usually #1 Doubles 86%, also #2 Doubles 14% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Vince Cheverine + Ron Novak2537% games+1.6% vs expected
Tom Pozza + Brian Lambright7157% gamesnot enough data
Ron Novak + Brian Lambright4351% gamesnot enough data
Vince Cheverine + Jeff Belton3350% gamesnot enough data
Vince Cheverine + Brian Lambright1538% gamesnot enough data
Vince Cheverine + John Ragner213 matchesnot enough data
John Ragner + Jeff Belton303 matchesnot enough data
Brian Lambright + David Cutler123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jeff Belton
29W–28L career · 4 lines in 2024
69%31%<1%
2.93
Tavi Muresan
33W–30L career · no lines in 2024
1%89%10%
2.82
Ron Novak
84W–144L career · 5 lines in 2024
2%92%6%
2.78
3
Brian Lambright
84W–157L career · 8 lines in 2024
3%92%5%
2.77
John Ragner
28W–48L career · 3 lines in 2024
7%91%2%
2.70
3
David Cutler
9W–14L career · 3 lines in 2024
18%82%<1%
2.63
Mark Robeson
10W–24L career · 3 lines in 2024
49%51%<1%
2.50
Vince Cheverine
60W–172L career · 5 lines in 2024
53%47%<1%
2.49
Rich Herbruck
24W–60L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Tom Pozza
46W–54L career · 7 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.