Teams

A55 6.0M AO Macfarlane

2024 NEOTA Adult 55 & Over Summer · NEOTA A55&O 6.0 Men Summer

12 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTHEASTERN OHIO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-07-24vs A55 6.0M TP1 PozzaSplit 11
L#2 DoublesGreg Matzinger / Brian Chambers vs Vince Cheverine / Ron Novak3-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesJohn Finucane / Sean Curtin vs Christopher Peters / Mark Robeson6-1, 6-2
2024-07-10vs A55 6.0M TP2 SchulteWon 21
W#1 DoublesJeff Myers / Ron Salim vs Michael Kramer / James Taylor4-6, 6-1, 1-0
L#2 DoublesRick Baker / James Sweeney vs Robert Moore / Chris Was2-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesGeoff Purtill / Tom Mullee vs Troy Smith / Jeff Scafaro6-2, 3-6, 1-0
2024-06-26vs A55 6.0M PW LongoriaLost 12
L#1 DoublesFernando Bertero / Ron Salim vs John Shami / Paul Sutor3-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#2 DoublesSean Curtin / Ted MacFarlane vs Roland Ciaramitaro / Richard Lancaster1-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#3 DoublesGreg Matzinger / Brian Chambers vs Daniel Lachowyn / John Ziska6-1, 6-2
2024-06-19vs OH NEO A55 6.0M CortsLost 12
W#1 DoublesTed MacFarlane / Ron Salim vs Ben Zagorski / Steven Pauwels6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesTom Mullee / Brian Chambers vs Michael Boukzam / Robert Rosenau2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesChuck Andes / James Sweeney vs James Wang / David Andrews0-6, 1-6
2024-06-12vs A55 6.0M TP1 PozzaLost 12
L#1 DoublesJames Sweeney / Greg Matzinger vs Brian Lambright / David Cutler1-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesFernando Bertero / John Finucane vs Ron Novak / Mark Robeson7-5, 6-1
L#3 DoublesJeff Myers / Tom Mullee vs John Ragner / Jeff Belton2-6, 4-6
2024-05-29vs A55 6.0M TP2 SchulteWon 21
W#1 DoublesFernando Bertero / Jeff Myers vs James Schulte / James Taylor7-6, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesGeoff Purtill / Chuck Andes vs Michael Kramer / Chris Was0-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesTed MacFarlane / Sean Curtin vs Troy Smith / Jeff Scafaro5-7, 6-1, 1-0
2024-05-22vs A55 6.0M PW LongoriaWon 21
W#1 DoublesFernando Bertero / Jeff Myers vs Daniel Lachowyn / John Ziska6-1, 6-2
L#2 DoublesRon Salim / James Sweeney vs Roland Ciaramitaro / Richard Lancaster4-6, 6-7
W#3 DoublesGeoff Purtill / Rick Baker vs David Bennhoff / Steve Hoelzer6-7, 6-4, 1-0
2024-05-15vs OH NEO A55 6.0M CortsLost 03
L#1 DoublesJames Sweeney / Greg Matzinger vs Steven Pauwels / Robert Corts1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesRon Salim / Rick Baker vs Robert Rosenau / James Wang5-7, 6-7
L#3 DoublesTom Mullee / Chuck Andes vs Duane Sycz / Bernard Andrews4-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings5 teams · NEOTA A55&O 6.0 Men Summer
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1OH NEO A55 6.0M Corts8019512144
2A55 6.0M TP1 Pozza6215923203
3A55 6.0M AO Macfarlane35101434239
4A55 6.0M PW Longoria2681637270
5A55 6.0M TP2 Schulte1781634224

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.79 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.90
Ted MacFarlane
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.84
Ron Salim
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
2.82
Brian Chambers
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.81
Greg Matzinger
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.76
Chuck Andes
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.61
John Finucane
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Fernando Bertero
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Geoff Purtill
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
James Sweeney
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
Rick Baker
published
Sean Curtin
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Tom Mullee
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

James Sweeney + Greg Matzinger1635% gamesnot enough data
Fernando Bertero + Ted MacFarlane3445% gamesnot enough data
John Finucane + Greg Matzinger2446% gamesnot enough data
James Sweeney + Ron Salim314 matchesnot enough data
Ron Salim + John Finucane314 matchesnot enough data
John Finucane + Rick Baker134 matchesnot enough data
James Sweeney + John Finucane213 matchesnot enough data
Ron Salim + Greg Matzinger123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Ted MacFarlane
28W–26L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%75%24%
2.90
Ron Salim
19W–16L career · 5 lines in 2024
1%86%13%
2.84
3
Brian Chambers
26W–37L career · 3 lines in 2024
1%89%10%
2.82
Greg Matzinger
15W–21L career · 4 lines in 2024
1%90%9%
2.81
3
Chuck Andes
7W–14L career · 3 lines in 2024
3%93%4%
2.76
John Finucane
13W–25L career · 2 lines in 2024
21%79%<1%
2.61
Fernando Bertero
26W–33L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data
Geoff Purtill
2W–1L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
James Sweeney
17W–21L career · 5 lines in 2024
not enough data
Rick Baker
1W–4L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Sean Curtin
2W–4L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
Tom Mullee
16W–26L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.