Teams

Sets Machine-Bourland/Mangan

2019 One Doubles · 2.5 Women

2 players · average NTRP 3 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 2.74 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.75
Anne Mangan
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.72
Madeleine Bourland
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
Results7 ties
2019-07-27Lost 01
L#1 DoublesMadeleine Bourland / Anne Mangan vs Jill Boyce / Rashmi Nath6-3, 6-4
2019-07-25Lost 01
L#1 DoublesMadeleine Bourland / Molly Hisatomi vs Clarice Brown / Nancy Yen Shipley6-4, 7-6
2019-07-01Won 10
W#1 DoublesMadeleine Bourland / Molly Hisatomi vs Erin Dineen / Nancy Yen Shipley6-2, 6-1
2019-06-30Won 10
W#1 DoublesMadeleine Bourland / Anne Mangan vs Clarice Brown / Erin Dineen4-6, 6-2, 1-0
2019-06-25Won 10
W#1 DoublesKelly Goodman / Anne Mangan vs Anshu Ahluwalia / Rashmi Nath6-3, 7-5
2019-06-24Lost 01
L#1 DoublesMolly Hisatomi / Anne Mangan vs Clarice Brown / Erin Dineen3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2019-06-09Lost 01
L#1 DoublesMadeleine Bourland / Kelly Goodman vs Jill Boyce / Anshu Ahluwalia6-3, 6-7, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

3
Anne Mangan
62W–74L career
6%91%4%
2.75
3
Madeleine Bourland
64W–53L career
2%98%0%
2.72

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.