Teams

E.MORITZ

2023 Cap Adult 18 & Over · 3.5 Men

14 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2023-05-07vs G.Stallings 18+ 3.5Won 20
W#2 DoublesMitchell Wolborsky / Jeff Abercrombie vs Edwin Braswell / Stephen Kuss6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesJames Coblentz / Christopher Bricker vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2023-05-07vs A.Womack 3.5Lost 02
L#2 DoublesJeff Abercrombie / Mitchell Wolborsky vs Patrick Stephenson / Adam Deuel3-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesEric Moritz / Christopher Bricker vs Anthony Womack / Anthony Thomas2-6, 2-6
2023-04-25vs J.Nance/GLovejoy 18Won 30
W#1 DoublesJeff Abercrombie / Mitchell Wolborsky vs Fernando Garcia Banuelos / Nick Strope6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesGraham Wright / Philip Gugliotta vs Leo Manning / Garrett Lovejoy6-3, 6-1
W#3 DoublesDarian Spell / Rahul Arora vs Billy Usrey / Austin Williams4-6, 6-1, 1-0
2023-04-23vs B.BaurSplit 22
W#1 DoublesChun Lav / Philip Gugliotta vs Brad Killian / Stephen Jorge6-1, 1-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesDarian Spell vs Derek Noble3-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJeff Abercrombie / Mitchell Wolborsky vs Joseph Brown / Roy Kelly2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesChristopher Bricker / Gregory Beyer vs Scott Patton / Jeffery Troch2-6, 0-6
2023-04-16vs K.HamptonWon 21
W#1 DoublesChun Lav / Graham Wright vs Tyler Priest / Bill Green5-7, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJeff Abercrombie / Mitchell Wolborsky vs David Kelly / Brian Kaulback6-1, 6-0
L#2 SinglesDarian Spell vs Ian Campbell5-7, 4-6
2023-04-11vs E.PERKINSSplit 11
L#2 DoublesChun Lav / Darian Spell vs Adam Dailey / Willie Griffin1-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesEric Moritz / Philip Gugliotta vs Lee Ritsema / John Perkins4-2
2023-04-09Won 10
W#3 DoublesJames Coblentz / Chun Lav vs Curtis Tillman / Robert Lockard7-5, 6-4
2023-03-19vs J.StieglerLost 02
L#1 DoublesChun Lav / Philip Gugliotta vs Randeep Grewal / Craig Brehmer4-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesChristopher Bricker vs Alex Radulovic1-6, 0-6
2023-03-05vs S.Masood 3.5Lost 03
L#1 DoublesMitchell Wolborsky / Jeff Abercrombie vs Saad Masood / Edward Aiken7-5, 4-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesJames Coblentz vs Andrew Cole0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesPhilip Gugliotta / Scott Stutts vs David Zatz / Raoul Chinang5-7, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.25 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.48
Mitchell Wolborsky
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.37
Jeff Abercrombie
published
3.37
Rahul Arora
published
3.35
Brooks Lowe
published 3.5
3.35
Chun Lav
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published 3.5
3.28
Christopher Bricker
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 3.5
3.26
Darian Spell
usually #2 Doubles 25%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 3.5
3.26
Philip Gugliotta
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 30% · published 3.5
3.23
James Coblentz
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 17% · published 3.5
3.21
Graham Wright
published
3.18
Emanuele Michi
published
3.16
Gregory Beyer
published
3.12
Scott Stutts
published
2.84
Eric Moritz
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mitchell Wolborsky + Jeff Abercrombie7557% games+8.4% vs expected
Philip Gugliotta + James Coblentz6946% games−6.9% vs expected
Philip Gugliotta + Chun Lav131548% games−14.1% vs expected
Darian Spell + Mitchell Wolborsky8360% gamesnot enough data
Chun Lav + Darian Spell3541% gamesnot enough data
Darian Spell + Christopher Bricker5257% gamesnot enough data
Christopher Bricker + James Coblentz6166% gamesnot enough data
Mitchell Wolborsky + James Coblentz4258% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Mitchell Wolborsky
172W–87L career · 6 lines in 2023
<1%54%46%
3.48
Jeff Abercrombie
27W–25L career · no lines in 2023
<1%82%17%
3.37
Rahul Arora
11W–17L career · no lines in 2023
<1%82%17%
3.37
3.5
Brooks Lowe
14W–14L career · no lines in 2023
1%85%15%
3.35
3.5
Chun Lav
149W–148L career · 7 lines in 2023
1%85%15%
3.35
3.5
Christopher Bricker
60W–89L career · 4 lines in 2023
2%92%6%
3.28
3.5
Darian Spell
90W–82L career · 4 lines in 2023
3%92%5%
3.26
3.5
Philip Gugliotta
173W–162L career · 10 lines in 2023
3%93%4%
3.26
3.5
James Coblentz
118W–76L career · 6 lines in 2023
5%92%3%
3.23
Graham Wright
7W–7L career · no lines in 2023
7%91%2%
3.21
Emanuele Michi
4W–8L career · no lines in 2023
10%89%1%
3.18
Gregory Beyer
2W–6L career · no lines in 2023
13%86%1%
3.16
Scott Stutts
2W–2L career · no lines in 2023
19%81%<1%
3.12
Eric Moritz
8W–14L career · no lines in 2023
1%86%13%
2.84

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.