Teams

Team 3 Lyu

2026 EMA 18-39 League · Winchester

11 players · average NTRP 3.67 / EASTERN MASSACHUSETTS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Flight standings15 teams · Winchester
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Winchester 18-39 League000000
2Team 8 Kelley06102626231
3Team 10 Mouzakitis07123030268
4Team 12 Sitaropoulos08242424252
5Team 9 Alpert08173131287
6Team 7 Gilson09361818230
7Team 6 Boryan09292525291
8Team 1 Tan0945050400
9Team 3 Lyu010501010194
10Team Volleyamorous:Bassel010441616268
11Team 2 Ge010342626276
12Team 5 Henize010312929347
13Team 4 Macomber010263434320
14Team 14 Dong011343232363
15Team 13 Jimenez011323434377

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.49 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.03
Xiyuan Li
published
3.67
XING LYU
published
3.64
Tianyang Guo
published
3.57
Chenke Li
published 4
3.44
Huanyi Yang
published 3.5
3.23
Kexin Yang
published
3.23
Anlun Liu
published 3.5
3.08
Yingshan Zhao
published
Jiawen Dai
published
Shihao Chen
published
Yu Yan
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kexin Yang + Huanyi Yang3448% games−3.5% vs expected
Yingshan Zhao + Yu Yan033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Xiyuan Li
44W–17L career · no lines in 2026
<1%41%59%
4.03
XING LYU
35W–23L career · no lines in 2026
10%90%1%
3.67
Tianyang Guo
8W–1L career · no lines in 2026
<1%14%86%
3.64
4
Chenke Li
8W–8L career · no lines in 2026
31%69%<1%
3.57
3.5
Huanyi Yang
12W–8L career · no lines in 2026
<1%69%31%
3.44
Kexin Yang
4W–6L career · no lines in 2026
4%94%2%
3.23
3.5
Anlun Liu
5W–5L career · type S · no lines in 2026
4%94%2%
3.23
Yingshan Zhao
2W–10L career · no lines in 2026
26%74%<1%
3.08
Jiawen Dai
0W–5L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Shihao Chen
6W–3L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Yu Yan
0W–4L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.