Teams

Team Volleyamorous:Bassel

2026 EMA 18-39 League · Winchester

9 players · average NTRP 3.67 / EASTERN MASSACHUSETTS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-01-31Won 10
W#1 Female DoublesSarah Abraham / Emily Harris vs Lauren Thomann / Alex Jones8-5
2026-01-17vs Team 12 SitaropoulosWon 10
W#1 Female DoublesEmily Harris / Sarah Forward vs Samantha Cardwell / Melina Koukoutchos8-6
2026-01-10Won 10
W#1 Female SinglesEmily Harris vs Maria Wanzek8-2
2026-01-03vs Team 9 AlpertWon 10
W#1 Female DoublesEmily Harris / Megan Liu vs Elizabeth Beaulieu / Thanh Bui7-5
2025-12-13vs Team 12 SitaropoulosWon 10
W#1 Female DoublesSarah Forward / Emily Harris vs Melina Koukoutchos / Leslie Wang6-4
2025-11-15vs Team 7 GilsonWon 10
W#1 Female DoublesEmily Harris / Alyxandra Bassile-McCarthy vs Rachel Cooke / Janet Martinelli8-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings15 teams · Winchester
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Winchester 18-39 League000000
2Team 8 Kelley06102626231
3Team 10 Mouzakitis07123030268
4Team 12 Sitaropoulos08242424252
5Team 9 Alpert08173131287
6Team 7 Gilson09361818230
7Team 6 Boryan09292525291
8Team 1 Tan0945050400
9Team 3 Lyu010501010194
10Team Volleyamorous:Bassel010441616268
11Team 2 Ge010342626276
12Team 5 Henize010312929347
13Team 4 Macomber010263434320
14Team 14 Dong011343232363
15Team 13 Jimenez011323434377

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.51 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.91
Megan Liu
published
3.89
Emily Harris
usually #1 Female Doubles 83%, also #1 Female Singles 17% · published 4
3.75
David Dopfel
published
3.69
Peter Hess
published
3.54
William McNicholas
published
3.36
Steven Crowe
published
3.30
Alex Deng
published 3.5
3.09
Bassel Said
published 3.5
3.07
Susan Hsiong
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Steven Crowe + Alex Deng224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Megan Liu
4W–6L career · no lines in 2026
<1%75%24%
3.91
4
Emily Harris
18W–11L career · type S · 6 lines in 2026
<1%79%21%
3.89
David Dopfel
1W–2L career · no lines in 2026
3%95%3%
3.75
Peter Hess
1W–5L career · no lines in 2026
7%92%1%
3.69
William McNicholas
3W–7L career · no lines in 2026
36%64%<1%
3.54
Steven Crowe
5W–5L career · no lines in 2026
<1%85%14%
3.36
3.5
Alex Deng
4W–4L career · type S · no lines in 2026
1%93%6%
3.30
3.5
Bassel Said
2W–5L career · type S · no lines in 2026
23%76%<1%
3.09
Susan Hsiong
1W–7L career · no lines in 2026
28%71%<1%
3.07

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.