Teams

Men's Quads

2026 NOGTA Spring Quads · Quads

15 players · average NTRP 3.88 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Quads have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.19 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Gregorio Rojas
published 4.5
3.29
Ashwin Venkatesu
published 3.5
3.22
Johnny Kendrick
published
3.20
Phil Johnson
published
3.07
Brian Hammontree
published 3.5
3.04
Scott King
published
2.89
Kyle Gonzalez-lloyd
published
2.87
Richard Morrison
published
Dean Puryear
published
Jim Richards
published
Manuel Guzman
published
Ricardo Pedrotti
published
Zac Raughton
published
Zach Jones
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Phil Johnson + Gireeshkumar Gopinathakaimal3254% gamesnot enough data
Brian Hammontree + Scott King404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Gregorio Rojas
0W–4L career · type S · no lines in 2026
not enough data
4
Gireeshkumar Gopinathakaimal
9W–23L career · type M · no lines in 2026
<1%68%32%
3.94
3.5
Ashwin Venkatesu
19W–20L career · no lines in 2026
1%93%6%
3.29
Johnny Kendrick
8W–9L career · no lines in 2026
<1%5%95%
3.22
Phil Johnson
3W–12L career · no lines in 2026
<1%7%93%
3.20
3.5
Brian Hammontree
27W–6L career · no lines in 2026
29%71%<1%
3.07
Scott King
39W–13L career · no lines in 2026
0%<1%>99%
3.04
Kyle Gonzalez-lloyd
3W–0L career · no lines in 2026
0%<1%>99%
2.89
Richard Morrison
18W–17L career · no lines in 2026
<1%84%15%
2.87
Dean Puryear
0W–2L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Jim Richards
1W–3L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Manuel Guzman
2W–3L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Ricardo Pedrotti
0W–5L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Zac Raughton
0W–3L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Zach Jones
0W–2L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.