Teams

Northern: 7.0 W 55 Raffa

2025 55&Over Women · 7.0

11 players · average NTRP 3.35 / NORTHERN REGION

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-08-28vs The Young and the Rest of UsWon 21
L#1 DoublesBeverly Swimm / Jo Anne Raffa vs Donna Arnold / Mary Fiess Shaffer6-2, 2-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesSusan Quine-Laurilliard / Paula Doherty vs Cathy Lott / Nancy Lott6-2, 6-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJudy Pittz / Linda Dygert vs Trish McKinney / Jane Gottlieb3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2025-08-19vs The Young and the Rest of UsLost 03
L#1 DoublesBeverly Swimm / Suzanne Hauber vs Cathy Griffin / Kirsten MacTavish6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesSherry Best / Linda Dygert vs Paddi McGrinder / Trish McKinney6-4, 2-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesGlenda Kelman / Jo Anne Raffa vs Moira Israelson / Nancy Lott0-6, 1-6
2025-08-05vs The Young and the Rest of UsWon 21
W#1 DoublesJudy Pittz / Nena Rezic vs Donna Arnold / Lesa Farrell6-0, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesBeverly Swimm / Linda Dygert vs Cathy Lott / Nancy Lott6-1, 6-1
L#3 DoublesPaula Doherty / Susan Quine-Laurilliard vs Kathy Fields / Trish McKinney5-7, 0-6
2025-07-29vs The Young and the Rest of UsWon 21
W#1 DoublesLinda Dygert / Beverly Swimm vs Peggy Breitbart / Nina Preston3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesSherry Best / Paula Doherty vs Cathy Lott / Nancy Lott4-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesGlenda Kelman / Kathleen Moran vs Mary Fiess Shaffer / Jane Gottlieb5-7, 6-3, 1-0
2025-07-22vs The Young and the Rest of UsLost 12
W#1 DoublesBeverly Swimm / Kathleen Moran vs Lesa Farrell / Moira Israelson5-7, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJudy Pittz / Nena Rezic vs Peggy Breitbart / Roxanne Dejohn5-7, 6-4, 0-1
L#3 DoublesPaula Doherty / Glenda Kelman vs Cathy Griffin / Kirsten MacTavish3-6, 2-6
2025-07-15vs The Young and the Rest of UsWon 30
W#1 DoublesPaula Doherty / Beverly Swimm vs Nina Preston / Trish McKinney6-1, 7-5
W#2 DoublesJudy Pittz / Nena Rezic vs Roxanne Dejohn / Paddi McGrinder6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesKathleen Moran / Susan Quine-Laurilliard vs Cathy Lott / Jane Gottlieb6-1, 6-7, 1-0
2025-07-08vs The Young and the Rest of UsWon 21
W#1 DoublesLinda Dygert / Beverly Swimm vs Moira Israelson / Kathy Fields6-4, 6-1
L#2 DoublesGlenda Kelman / Suzanne Hauber vs Paddi McGrinder / Roxanne Dejohn3-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesSusan Quine-Laurilliard / Paula Doherty vs Cathy Lott / Nina Preston6-4, 7-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 7.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Northern: 7.0 W 55 Raffa5212925189
2The Young and the Rest of Us2591228201

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.18 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.88
Beverly Swimm
usually #1 Doubles 86%, also #2 Doubles 14% · published 4
3.75
Susan Quine-Laurilliard
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.44
Nena Rezic
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.29
Judy Pittz
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.23
Sherry Best
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 43% · published 3.5
3.23
Glenda Kelman
usually #3 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
2.94
Kathleen Moran
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.88
Linda Dygert
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published 3
2.86
Jo Anne Raffa
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 22% · published 3
2.83
Suzanne Hauber
usually #1 Doubles 55%, also #2 Doubles 46% · published 3
2.68
Paula Doherty
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Beverly Swimm + Linda Dygert5164% games+10.4% vs expected
Linda Dygert + Suzanne Hauber14855% games−3.4% vs expected
Glenda Kelman + Susan Quine-Laurilliard121746% games−6.9% vs expected
Paula Doherty + Kathleen Moran7852% games−7.6% vs expected
Susan Quine-Laurilliard + Paula Doherty2442% games−10.7% vs expected
Paula Doherty + Suzanne Hauber1632% games−13.5% vs expected
Sherry Best + Linda Dygert7552% gamesnot enough data
Kathleen Moran + Judy Pittz2345% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Beverly Swimm
121W–98L career · 7 lines in 2025
<1%80%20%
3.88
4
Susan Quine-Laurilliard
124W–133L career · 6 lines in 2025
4%93%4%
3.75
Nena Rezic
25W–20L career · 3 lines in 2025
67%33%<1%
3.44
3.5
Judy Pittz
67W–44L career · 4 lines in 2025
2%91%7%
3.29
3.5
Sherry Best
56W–82L career · 7 lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.23
3.5
Glenda Kelman
59W–81L career · 6 lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.23
3
Kathleen Moran
102W–129L career · 10 lines in 2025
<1%67%33%
2.94
3
Linda Dygert
84W–87L career · 14 lines in 2025
<1%80%20%
2.88
3
Jo Anne Raffa
53W–44L career · 9 lines in 2025
1%84%16%
2.86
3
Suzanne Hauber
68W–90L career · 11 lines in 2025
1%88%11%
2.83
3
Paula Doherty
50W–141L career · 14 lines in 2025
10%89%1%
2.68

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.