Teams

WI Combo 6.5W Malone Park Kotar

2022 WI Combo · WI Combo 6.5 Women - Eve

11 players · average NTRP 3.36 / WISCONSIN

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2022-10-18vs WI Combo 6.5W Mequon Elite BuellWon 30
W#1 DoublesGabrielle Hendrix / Bethany Girardi vs Kay Bokowy / Sally Haldorson7-6, 7-6
W#2 DoublesNatalie Hendrix / Tara Ali vs Wendy Fischer / Sharon Gundlach7-6, 7-5
W#3 DoublesErin Mohrbacker / Tanya Kotar vs Robyn Wilgreen / Kelly Keane6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2022-10-04vs WI Combo 6.5W FLAC GromackiWon 21
W#1 DoublesGabrielle Hendrix / Bethany Girardi vs Stacee Busateri / Katie Kennedy6-1, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesErin Mohrbacker / Joyce Casey vs Melissa Hartwig / Amy Pulokas4-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesNatalie Hendrix / Debra George vs Joy Asta / Kathy Kort6-2, 6-7, 1-0
W#1 DoublesGabrielle Hendrix / Katie Schultz vs Sara Kemp / Katie Knudsen7-6, 6-3
W#2 DoublesTanya Kotar / Natalie Hendrix vs Paula Shows / Patricia Hanz7-6, 2-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesKristi Luzar / Debra George vs Eileen Paykel / Jacqueline Wiedmeyer1-6, 2-6
W#1 DoublesBrigitte Potter / Erin Mohrbacker vs Suzanne Thomas / Arleen More O'Ferrall5-7, 7-5, 1-0
L#2 DoublesKatie Schultz / Joyce Casey vs Meike Mansfield / Tami Vincent2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesTara Ali / Kristi Luzar vs Stephanie Winterhalter / Paula Rivet1-6, 5-7
2022-09-13vs WI Combo 6.5W TBD UnderwoodWon 21
W#1 DoublesErin Mohrbacker / Gabrielle Hendrix vs Dina Davis / Lauren Hansen6-1, 6-4
L#2 DoublesKatie Schultz / Joyce Casey vs Joy Cutts / Victoria Underwood1-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesBrigitte Potter / Natalie Hendrix vs Cana Comer / Michelle Thren6-1, 6-2
W#1 DoublesBethany Girardi / Gabrielle Hendrix vs Julie Limberg / Leann Pomeroy6-2, 6-4
W#2 DoublesTara Ali / Brigitte Potter vs Diane Bretl / Jona Lestan6-3, 7-6
W#3 DoublesTanya Kotar / Debra George vs Candice Strueder / Nancy Dewane1-6, 7-5, 1-0
2022-08-30vs WI Combo 6.5W Elm Grove MoskowLost 12
L#1 DoublesBethany Girardi / Joyce Casey vs Nicole Penegor / Deanna Weiss0-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesErin Mohrbacker / Tanya Kotar vs Karen Moskow / Katy Steinbach5-7, 7-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesDebra George / Brigitte Potter vs GERDA MAHER / Anjali Sharma6-1, 6-2
W#1 DoublesJoyce Casey / Erin Mohrbacker vs Marjorie Mccarthy / Arlene Adams6-0, 6-3
W#2 DoublesNatalie Hendrix / Katie Schultz vs Deborah Ciszewski / Christine Bessler1-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesBethany Girardi / Gabrielle Hendrix vs Kathleen Kas-Amby / Mary Ellison6-0, 6-0
W#1 DoublesGabrielle Hendrix / Bethany Girardi vs Lee Heinrich / Sara Feider6-2, 2-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesDebra George / Kristi Luzar vs Lisa Ellegard / Gail Thorpe1-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesTara Ali / Natalie Hendrix vs Sarah Langerman / Kristin Bremenkamp5-7, 6-4, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WI Combo 6.5 Women - Eve have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.07 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.45
Erin Mohrbacker
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.42
Katie Schultz
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.39
Brigitte Potter
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.16
Bethany Girardi
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
3.14
Gabrielle Hendrix
usually #1 Doubles 86%, also #3 Doubles 14% · published 3.5
3.09
Tara Ali
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.08
Debra George
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.01
Natalie Hendrix
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
2.77
Joyce Casey
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.66
Tanya Kotar
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.61
Kristi Luzar
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Brigitte Potter + Gabrielle Hendrix19658% games+4.8% vs expected
Debra George + Natalie Hendrix5454% games+3.9% vs expected
Natalie Hendrix + Gabrielle Hendrix251456% games+2.4% vs expected
Natalie Hendrix + Tara Ali4354% games+1.3% vs expected
Tanya Kotar + Gabrielle Hendrix1543% games−3.0% vs expected
Bethany Girardi + Gabrielle Hendrix10253% games−3.6% vs expected
Debra George + Tanya Kotar11749% games−4.8% vs expected
Bethany Girardi + Tanya Kotar1638% games−12.2% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Erin Mohrbacker
96W–113L career · 6 lines in 2022
<1%65%35%
3.45
3.5
Katie Schultz
41W–30L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%73%27%
3.42
3.5
Brigitte Potter
53W–27L career · 2 lines in 2022
<1%80%20%
3.39
3.5
Bethany Girardi
41W–46L career · 6 lines in 2022
11%88%<1%
3.16
3.5
Gabrielle Hendrix
84W–53L career · 7 lines in 2022
13%86%<1%
3.14
3.5
Tara Ali
34W–46L career · 4 lines in 2022
24%75%<1%
3.09
3.5
Debra George
28W–31L career · 5 lines in 2022
27%73%<1%
3.08
3.5
Natalie Hendrix
72W–52L career · 6 lines in 2022
46%54%<1%
3.01
3
Joyce Casey
62W–113L career · 5 lines in 2022
2%94%4%
2.77
3
Tanya Kotar
63W–71L career · 4 lines in 2022
11%88%<1%
2.66
3
Kristi Luzar
20W–55L career · 3 lines in 2022
21%79%<1%
2.61

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.