Teams

WI Combo 6.5W River Glen Elite Heinrich

2022 WI Combo · WI Combo 6.5 Women - Eve

10 players · average NTRP 3.44 / WISCONSIN

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2022-10-11vs WI Combo 6.5W Elm Grove MoskowLost 12
W#1 DoublesSarah Langerman / Sara Feider vs Wei Speagle / Cara Buchanan6-1, 6-4
L#2 DoublesHeather Szerbat / Kristin Bremenkamp vs Christine Laemmar'Faber / Deanna Weiss4-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesLee Heinrich / Gail Thorpe vs Karen Moskow / Anjali Sharma2-6, 1-6
W#1 DoublesLee Heinrich / Sara Feider vs Jane Mlenar / Stephanie Jansen6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesSarah Langerman / Susan Arensmeier vs Jane Schrimpf / Janice Gardetto6-0, 6-2
W#3 DoublesLisa Ellegard / Cynthia Rice vs Wendy Cartwright / Marjorie Mccarthy6-2, 6-2
W#1 DoublesLisa Ellegard / Sara Feider vs Julie Limberg / Candice Strueder6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesSarah Langerman / Kristin Bremenkamp vs Lauren Kaiser / Jona Lestan7-6, 6-4
W#3 DoublesLee Heinrich / Susan Arensmeier vs Sharon Webb / Leann Pomeroy6-7, 6-3, 1-0
2022-09-20vs WI Combo 6.5W Mequon Elite BuellWon 30
W#1 DoublesHeather Szerbat / Susan Arensmeier vs Barbara Meyers / Wendy Fischer6-2, 6-4
W#2 DoublesLee Heinrich / Sara Feider vs Sharon Gundlach / Sandy Schumaker6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesLisa Ellegard / Cynthia Rice vs Angela Johnson / Robyn Wilgreen6-2, 6-2
2022-09-13vs WI Combo 6.5W FLAC GromackiLost 12
L#1 DoublesCathy Thum / Cynthia Rice vs Katie Kennedy / Sandra Nass2-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesLee Heinrich / Sara Feider vs Andrea Gromacki / Stacee Busateri6-2, 6-4
L#3 DoublesLisa Ellegard / Gail Thorpe vs Lynette Trost / Sarah Augustson3-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#1 DoublesLee Heinrich / Cynthia Rice vs Sara Kemp / Peggy Pomplin2-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#2 DoublesSarah Langerman / Sara Feider vs Eileen Paykel / Jacqueline Wiedmeyer6-0, 6-1
W#3 DoublesHeather Szerbat / Kristin Bremenkamp vs Jeanine Swenson / Katie Knudsen6-1, 6-0
L#1 DoublesLisa Ellegard / Susan Arensmeier vs Arleen More O'Ferrall / Suzanne Thomas5-7, 6-7
L#2 DoublesSarah Langerman / Kristin Bremenkamp vs Leah Damron / Margaret Oteman7-5, 4-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesHeather Szerbat / Gail Thorpe vs Paula Rivet / Tami Vincent6-3, 6-1
2022-08-23vs WI Combo 6.5W TBD UnderwoodWon 21
W#1 DoublesLisa Ellegard / Susan Arensmeier vs Joy Cutts / Lauren Hansen6-3, 6-0
W#2 DoublesKristin Bremenkamp / Heather Szerbat vs Dina Davis / Victoria Underwood7-6, 6-1
L#3 DoublesCathy Thum / Cynthia Rice vs Christie Ortwein / Connie Ward4-6, 3-6
2022-08-16vs WI Combo 6.5W Malone Park KotarWon 21
L#1 DoublesLee Heinrich / Sara Feider vs Gabrielle Hendrix / Bethany Girardi2-6, 6-2, 0-1
W#2 DoublesLisa Ellegard / Gail Thorpe vs Debra George / Kristi Luzar6-1, 7-5
W#3 DoublesSarah Langerman / Kristin Bremenkamp vs Tara Ali / Natalie Hendrix7-5, 4-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WI Combo 6.5 Women - Eve have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.10 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.74
Lisa Ellegard
usually #1 Doubles 55%, also #3 Doubles 27% · published 4
3.50
Heather Szerbat
usually #2 Doubles 44%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.42
Sarah Langerman
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.41
Sara Feider
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.30
Lee Heinrich
usually #1 Doubles 42%, also #2 Doubles 42% · published 3.5
2.92
Gail Thorpe
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.79
Kristin Bremenkamp
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.70
Cynthia Rice
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.66
Cathy Thum
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.62
Susan Arensmeier
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Heather Szerbat + Lee Heinrich8356% games+7.9% vs expected
Sarah Langerman + Heather Szerbat6264% games+7.1% vs expected
Lisa Ellegard + Heather Szerbat6255% games+6.9% vs expected
Sara Feider + Lee Heinrich16561% games+5.9% vs expected
Lisa Ellegard + Lee Heinrich22364% games+5.3% vs expected
Sarah Langerman + Kristin Bremenkamp3252% games+0.3% vs expected
Cynthia Rice + Sara Feider4362% gamesnot enough data
Sarah Langerman + Lee Heinrich4253% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Lisa Ellegard
92W–47L career · 11 lines in 2022
3%95%2%
3.74
4
Heather Szerbat
92W–34L career · 9 lines in 2022
50%50%<1%
3.50
3.5
Sarah Langerman
121W–48L career · 8 lines in 2022
<1%74%26%
3.42
3.5
Sara Feider
108W–48L career · 10 lines in 2022
<1%76%23%
3.41
3.5
Lee Heinrich
124W–51L career · 12 lines in 2022
1%93%6%
3.30
3
Gail Thorpe
60W–71L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%74%26%
2.92
Kristin Bremenkamp
32W–15L career · 6 lines in 2022
1%93%5%
2.79
3
Cynthia Rice
29W–42L career · 5 lines in 2022
6%93%1%
2.70
3
Cathy Thum
21W–75L career · 5 lines in 2022
11%88%<1%
2.66
Susan Arensmeier
42W–27L career · 5 lines in 2022
18%81%<1%
2.62

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.