Teams

Stratton/18/7.5/WCN/POTC

2026 Shrev-Boss Southern Combo 18 & Over - Women Night · 7.5 Shrev

18 players · average NTRP 3.79 / LOUISIANA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 upcoming · 3 played
Sep 14 6:00 PM
North Bossier Tennis Center
Sep 21 6:00 PM
Pierremont Oaks Tennis Club
Sep 28 6:00 PM
North Bossier Tennis Center
Oct 5 6:00 PM
Pierremont Oaks Tennis Club
Oct 12 6:00 PM
Pierremont Oaks Tennis Club
Oct 19 6:00 PM
Pierremont Oaks Tennis Club
2026-08-31vs Roberts/18/7.5/CWN/BTCWon 21
W#1 DoublesMeg Frazier / Catherine Reed vs Emily Burns / Sarah Dickson6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesJackie Gibson / Stephanie Knox vs Katherine Roberts / Sara Doughty6-3, 6-2
L#3 DoublesMary Jayroe / Alexis Green vs Ene Wang / Emily Truong2-6, 0-6
2026-08-24vs Cummer/18/7.5/CWN/POTCWon 30
W#1 DoublesKelly Stratton / Catherine Reed vs Karen Easterling / Kim McGuirt6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesTrisha Q-Petersen / Brandy Hayse vs Caroline Landon / Kimberly Arizmendi2-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#3 DoublesIndira Sartin / Lee Solis vs Elise McMahen / Audrey Robinson6-0, 6-1
2026-08-17vs Berry-Santos/18/7.5/CWN/BTCWon 21
L#1 DoublesMary Catherine Kneip / Karyn Triche vs Trish White / Dusty Rangel6-1, 4-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesSapna Tank / Lindy Jackson vs Amy Maranto / Sunny Thompson1-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesLauren Stevenson / Stephanie Knox vs Lynn Ferry-Nelson / Ann Sellers6-3, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · 7.5 Shrev
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Roberts/18/7.5/CWN/BTC1021222
2Stratton/18/7.5/WCN/POTC1021325
3Cummer/18/7.5/CWN/POTC0112429
4Berry-Santos/18/7.5/CWN/BTC0112531

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.52 estimated across 18 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.98
Brandy Hayse
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.96
Lucy Young
published
3.84
Jackie Gibson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.81
Meg Frazier
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.75
Alexis Green
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.72
Kelly Stratton
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.62
Amber Lewis
published 4
3.61
Lindy Jackson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.61
Mary Catherine Kneip
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.46
Catherine Reed
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.44
Indira Sartin
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.40
Sapna Tank
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.37
Lee Solis
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.32
Stephanie Knox
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.26
Catherine Simonton
published 3.5
3.24
Karyn Triche
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.06
Trisha Q-Petersen
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.01
Mary Jayroe
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Meg Frazier + Brandy Hayse7073% games+9.6% vs expected
Indira Sartin + Lee Solis4161% games+7.9% vs expected
Karyn Triche + Meg Frazier17561% games+5.9% vs expected
Kelly Stratton + Meg Frazier6069% games+3.3% vs expected
Stephanie Knox + Karyn Triche4157% games−4.3% vs expected
Stephanie Knox + Kelly Stratton4158% gamesnot enough data
Catherine Reed + Sapna Tank404 matchesnot enough data
Catherine Reed + Trisha Q-Petersen314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Brandy Hayse
44W–14L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%58%42%
3.98
Lucy Young
31W–13L career · no lines in 2026
<1%63%37%
3.96
4
Jackie Gibson
16W–4L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%89%11%
3.84
Meg Frazier
64W–9L career · 1 line in 2026
1%92%7%
3.81
4
Alexis Green
23W–7L career · 1 line in 2026
3%95%3%
3.75
Kelly Stratton
79W–30L career · 1 line in 2026
5%94%1%
3.72
4
Amber Lewis
30W–9L career · no lines in 2026
18%82%<1%
3.62
Lindy Jackson
17W–12L career · 1 line in 2026
20%80%<1%
3.61
Mary Catherine Kneip
19W–2L career · 1 line in 2026
20%80%<1%
3.61
3.5
Catherine Reed
64W–14L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%62%38%
3.46
3.5
Indira Sartin
35W–15L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%68%32%
3.44
Sapna Tank
51W–32L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%78%21%
3.40
Lee Solis
21W–4L career · 1 line in 2026
85%15%<1%
3.37
Stephanie Knox
75W–33L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%91%9%
3.32
3.5
Catherine Simonton
10W–31L career · no lines in 2026
2%95%3%
3.26
Karyn Triche
47W–26L career · 1 line in 2026
3%95%2%
3.24
Trisha Q-Petersen
19W–12L career · 1 line in 2026
32%67%<1%
3.06
Mary Jayroe
20W–42L career · 1 line in 2026
48%52%<1%
3.01

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.