Teams

Roberts/18/7.5/CWN/BTC

2026 Shrev-Boss Southern Combo 18 & Over - Women Night · 7.5 Shrev

14 players · average NTRP 3.50 / LOUISIANA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 upcoming · 3 played
Sep 14 6:00 PM
Pierremont Oaks Tennis Club
Sep 21 6:30 PM
North Bossier Tennis Center
Sep 28 6:00 PM
North Bossier Tennis Center
Oct 5 6:00 PM
North Bossier Tennis Center
Oct 12 6:00 PM
North Bossier Tennis Center
Oct 19 6:00 PM
Pierremont Oaks Tennis Club
2026-08-31vs Stratton/18/7.5/WCN/POTCLost 12
L#1 DoublesEmily Burns / Sarah Dickson vs Meg Frazier / Catherine Reed0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesKatherine Roberts / Sara Doughty vs Jackie Gibson / Stephanie Knox3-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesEne Wang / Emily Truong vs Mary Jayroe / Alexis Green6-2, 6-0
2026-08-24vs Berry-Santos/18/7.5/CWN/BTCLost 12
L#1 DoublesSara Doughty / Lindsay Dean vs Lyndsey Chandler / Roxanne Voigt3-6, 7-5, 0-1
W#2 DoublesEne Wang / Nong Boutaloth vs Trish White / Sunny Thompson7-5, 6-2
L#3 DoublesKatherine Roberts / Jeanna Choi vs Amy Maranto / Vanessa Hernandez7-5, 0-6, 0-1
2026-08-17vs Cummer/18/7.5/CWN/POTCWon 20
W#1 DoublesEne Wang / Emily Truong vs Emily Overdyke / Caroline Landon6-0, 6-1
W#2 DoublesSara Doughty / Emily Burns vs Karen McCoy / Kimberly Arizmendi7-6, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · 7.5 Shrev
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Roberts/18/7.5/CWN/BTC1021222
2Stratton/18/7.5/WCN/POTC1021325
3Cummer/18/7.5/CWN/POTC0112429
4Berry-Santos/18/7.5/CWN/BTC0112531

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.31 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.14
Emily Truong
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.68
Jeanna Choi
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.66
Sara Doughty
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.55
Ene Wang
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.39
Nong Boutaloth
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.24
Jenifer Gordon
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.23
Holly Hightower
published
3.21
Kathy Benton
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.20
Gina Robinson
published
3.18
Sarah Dickson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.15
Jenny Rodgers
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.12
Amy Basinger
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.05
Holly Bissell
published
2.61
Krysta Cyr
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ene Wang + Holly Hightower7074% games+15.8% vs expected
Nong Boutaloth + Jeanna Choi6156% games+6.7% vs expected
Amy Basinger + Jenifer Gordon2346% games+2.1% vs expected
Ene Wang + Gina Robinson314 matchesnot enough data
Kathy Benton + Amy Basinger134 matchesnot enough data
Holly Bissell + Jenny Rodgers213 matchesnot enough data
Emily Truong + Ene Wang213 matchesnot enough data
Ene Wang + Kathy Benton123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Emily Truong
8W–3L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%16%84%
4.14
Jeanna Choi
28W–14L career · 1 line in 2026
10%89%1%
3.68
Sara Doughty
66W–35L career · 3 lines in 2026
12%87%1%
3.66
Ene Wang
60W–23L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%36%64%
3.55
Nong Boutaloth
43W–25L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%79%21%
3.39
Jenifer Gordon
42W–47L career · 1 line in 2026
4%92%3%
3.24
Holly Hightower
27W–8L career · no lines in 2026
5%92%3%
3.23
Kathy Benton
38W–30L career · 2 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
3.21
Gina Robinson
30W–23L career · no lines in 2026
8%91%2%
3.20
Sarah Dickson
0W–6L career · 1 line in 2026
99%1%<1%
3.18
Jenny Rodgers
71W–28L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%15%85%
3.15
3.5
Amy Basinger
33W–16L career · 1 line in 2026
20%80%<1%
3.12
Holly Bissell
9W–22L career · no lines in 2026
36%64%<1%
3.05
Krysta Cyr
8W–11L career · no lines in 2026
22%77%<1%
2.61

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.