Teams

SD 4.5 Mtn View (SUN)/ Ruffo

2026 Adult 18 & Over Spring - SD WE · SD- Women- WE 4.5 (Sat

12 players · average NTRP 4.33 / SAN DIEGO

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-06-20vs SoCal/Emhardt/18&Over4.5WLost 12
L#1 DoublesSheena Patel / Guadalupe Rendon vs Tiffany Kellogg / ERIN HUGHES4-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesCindy Lim vs Elizabeth Zebian3-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 DoublesJoy Zheng / Edna Rendon vs Jacqueline Chafe / Carla Zarbo5-7, 6-3, 1-0
2026-06-11vs SD 4.5 FRCC (SAT)/ DoyleSplit 11
W#1 DoublesIsabella Gomez / Edna Rendon vs Anastasia Duboshina / Emily Bernstein6-1, 6-4
L#1 SinglesCindy Lim vs Carla Hansen6-4, 1-6, 0-1
2026-05-31vs SD 4.5 Mtn View (SUN)/ AquinoWon 30
W#1 DoublesEdna Rendon / Guadalupe Rendon vs Giana Guerra / Trishala Chari6-4, 6-3
W#1 SinglesZoe Davis vs Miroslava Song6-1, 6-0
W#2 DoublesFabiola Flores / Isabella Gomez vs Anna Burke / Kelly Jernigan6-1, 6-0
W#1 DoublesJoy Zheng / Vivian Lee vs Jada Cade / Sarina Lynn6-2, 6-2
L#1 SinglesZoe Davis vs Beth Mulcahy Elardo4-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesGuadalupe Rendon / Mariana Alvarez vs Whitney Ginter / Ashley Stone7-6, 6-3
W#1 DoublesClaudia Mendiola / Joy Zheng vs Angela Chang / Ashley Jay6-3, 6-3
W#1 SinglesCindy Lim vs Arianna Michaels6-1, 6-3
L#2 DoublesZoe Davis / Sheena Patel vs Melanie Hoad / Chloe Erikson4-6, 4-6
2026-04-26vs SD 4.5 SDTRC (SUN)/ KauffmanSplit 11
W#1 DoublesGuadalupe Rendon / Edna Rendon vs Yvonne Angyal / Darci Pani6-3, 6-0
L#2 DoublesClaudia Mendiola / Angie Colonna vs Carol Smith / Kristi Gray6-4, 3-6, 0-1
2026-04-12vs SD 4.5 PLNU (SAT/ SUN)/ SchardtWon 21
W#1 DoublesVivian Lee / Joy Zheng vs Carol Donahue / Loretta Warren6-4, 6-3
W#1 SinglesZoe Davis vs Ashley Kechter6-0, 7-5
L#2 DoublesFabiola Flores / Guadalupe Rendon vs Renee Schardt / Christy Fritts3-6, 2-6
2026-04-04vs SD 4.5 Peninsula TC (SAT)/ LaceySplit 11
L#1 DoublesSheena Patel / Zoe Davis vs Kellie Jaquez / Hillary Park2-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesEdna Rendon / Joy Zheng vs Dorian Sailer / Gabrielle Bartolome6-3, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings9 teams · SD- Women- WE 4.5 (Sat
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1SoCal/Emhardt/18&Over4.5W802227139
2SD 4.5 Mtn View (SUN)/ Ruffo7116817163
3SD 4.5 Coronado TC-HS (SUN)/ Warren62141024204
4SD 4.5 Peninsula TC (SAT)/ Lacey44131125201
5SD 4.5 FRCC (SAT)/ Doyle44121226201
6SD 4.5 Mtn View (SUN)/ Aquino2561532227
7SD 4.5 Penn Pack @ PTC (SAT)/ Ogihara26101428220
8SD 4.5 PLNU (SAT/ SUN)/ Schardt1671430205
9SD 4.5 SDTRC (SUN)/ Kauffman1742042262

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.12 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.42
Joy Zheng
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
4.25
Cindy Lim
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
4.20
Zoe Davis
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
4.19
Angie Colonna
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.17
Sheena Patel
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
4.13
Guadalupe Rendon
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
4.09
Fabiola Flores
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.08
Edna Rendon
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4.5
4.06
Claudia Mendiola
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
3.58
Veronica Ruffo
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
Isabella Gomez
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Mariana Alvarez
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Claudia Mendiola + Fabiola Flores8754% games+3.3% vs expected
Edna Rendon + Guadalupe Rendon10254% games+2.4% vs expected
Claudia Mendiola + Angie Colonna213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Joy Zheng
12W–5L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%73%27%
4.42
4
Cindy Lim
30W–9L career · 8 lines in 2026
<1%4%96%
4.25
Zoe Davis
6W–5L career · 5 lines in 2026
8%91%2%
4.20
4.5
Angie Colonna
8W–10L career · 1 line in 2026
8%90%1%
4.19
Sheena Patel
9W–22L career · 4 lines in 2026
11%88%1%
4.17
Guadalupe Rendon
13W–10L career · 5 lines in 2026
18%81%<1%
4.13
4.5
Fabiola Flores
125W–102L career · 2 lines in 2026
27%73%<1%
4.09
4.5
Edna Rendon
58W–23L career · 5 lines in 2026
30%70%<1%
4.08
4.5
Claudia Mendiola
42W–42L career · 2 lines in 2026
34%66%<1%
4.06
4
Veronica Ruffo
135W–157L career · 2 lines in 2026
28%71%<1%
3.58
Isabella Gomez
2W–0L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Mariana Alvarez
1W–0L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.