Teams

SD 4.5 FRCC (SAT)/ Doyle

2026 Adult 18 & Over Spring - SD WE · SD- Women- WE 4.5 (Sat

11 players · average NTRP 4.38 / SAN DIEGO

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-06-11vs SD 4.5 Mtn View (SUN)/ RuffoSplit 11
L#1 DoublesAnastasia Duboshina / Emily Bernstein vs Isabella Gomez / Edna Rendon1-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesCarla Hansen vs Cindy Lim4-6, 6-1, 1-0
2026-06-06vs SoCal/Emhardt/18&Over4.5WLost 12
L#1 DoublesCarla Hansen / Kendal Texeira vs Tiffany Kellogg / Elizabeth Workman6-7, 3-6
W#1 SinglesAnastasia Duboshina vs N/A6-0, 6-0
L#2 DoublesSarena Talbert / Dana Moskowitz vs Jacqueline Chafe / Vivian Lee2-6, 4-6
2026-05-23vs SD 4.5 Mtn View (SUN)/ AquinoWon 30
W#1 DoublesEmily Bernstein / Kellie Doyle vs Trishala Chari / Roanne Manzano-Roth6-7, 6-3, 1-0
W#1 SinglesCarla Hansen vs Miroslava Song7-5, 6-1
W#2 DoublesSarena Talbert / Anastasia Duboshina vs Kelly Jernigan / Sherr Aquino6-3, 6-3
2026-05-09vs SD 4.5 PLNU (SAT/ SUN)/ SchardtSplit 11
L#1 DoublesJane Khouw / Jennifer Caringal vs Courtney Mccue / Carol Donahue2-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesCarla Hansen vs Diane Ghiron6-1, 6-3
2026-05-03vs SD 4.5 SDTRC (SUN)/ KauffmanWon 30
W#1 DoublesAngela Hart / Jennifer Caringal vs Yvonne Angyal / Linda Milburn6-4, 6-2
W#1 SinglesCarla Hansen vs Susan Faltico6-1, 7-5
W#2 DoublesAnastasia Duboshina / Susan Lee vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2026-04-25vs SD 4.5 Peninsula TC (SAT)/ LaceySplit 11
L#1 DoublesSarena Talbert / Dana Moskowitz vs Shelley Goodson / Robin Hubbard2-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#1 SinglesCarla Hansen vs Samantha Polikowski6-1, 6-1
W#1 DoublesKellie Doyle / Dana Moskowitz vs Melanie Hoad / Eve Sullivan6-2, 6-4
W#1 SinglesCarla Hansen vs Arianna Michaels6-2, 6-3
L#2 DoublesKendal Texeira / Jennifer Caringal vs Ashley Jay / Cynthia Herrera1-6, 1-6
L#1 DoublesChristina Bernstein / Dana Moskowitz vs Alexia Palacios-Peters / Valerie Andrus3-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesSarena Talbert vs Gretchen Shaffer6-3, 6-7, 0-1
L#2 DoublesSusan Lee / Jane Khouw vs Alison Hagopian / Whitney Ginter0-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings9 teams · SD- Women- WE 4.5 (Sat
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1SoCal/Emhardt/18&Over4.5W802227139
2SD 4.5 Mtn View (SUN)/ Ruffo7116817163
3SD 4.5 Coronado TC-HS (SUN)/ Warren62141024204
4SD 4.5 Peninsula TC (SAT)/ Lacey44131125201
5SD 4.5 FRCC (SAT)/ Doyle44121226201
6SD 4.5 Mtn View (SUN)/ Aquino2561532227
7SD 4.5 Penn Pack @ PTC (SAT)/ Ogihara26101428220
8SD 4.5 PLNU (SAT/ SUN)/ Schardt1671430205
9SD 4.5 SDTRC (SUN)/ Kauffman1742042262

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.05 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.38
Carla Hansen
usually #1 Singles 86%, also #1 Doubles 14% · published 4.5
4.30
Emily Bernstein
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.22
Anastasia Duboshina
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 4.5
4.15
Angela Hart
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
4.09
Christina Bernstein
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.08
Kellie Doyle
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.08
Sarena Talbert
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 4.5
4.04
Dana Moskowitz
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
3.74
Jennifer Caringal
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.74
Kendal Texeira
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.72
Jane Khouw
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Dana Moskowitz + Sarena Talbert261555% games−1.5% vs expected
Kendal Texeira + Dana Moskowitz21762% games−3.5% vs expected
Dana Moskowitz + Anastasia Duboshina4352% gamesnot enough data
Anastasia Duboshina + Sarena Talbert4253% gamesnot enough data
Kendal Texeira + Sarena Talbert134 matchesnot enough data
Angela Hart + Jennifer Caringal224 matchesnot enough data
Carla Hansen + Emily Bernstein213 matchesnot enough data
Emily Bernstein + Anastasia Duboshina123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Carla Hansen
17W–4L career · 7 lines in 2026
<1%79%20%
4.38
Emily Bernstein
8W–13L career · 2 lines in 2026
2%91%7%
4.30
4.5
Anastasia Duboshina
144W–64L career · 4 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
4.22
4
Angela Hart
36W–14L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%15%85%
4.15
4.5
Christina Bernstein
8W–10L career · 1 line in 2026
25%75%<1%
4.09
4.5
Kellie Doyle
129W–116L career · 2 lines in 2026
28%71%<1%
4.08
4.5
Sarena Talbert
182W–133L career · 4 lines in 2026
29%71%<1%
4.08
4.5
Dana Moskowitz
158W–94L career · 4 lines in 2026
37%63%<1%
4.04
Jennifer Caringal
21W–14L career · 3 lines in 2026
4%93%3%
3.74
4
Kendal Texeira
118W–85L career · 2 lines in 2026
5%92%3%
3.74
Jane Khouw
16W–18L career · 2 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
3.72

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.