Teams

Nicotri/18s/5.5/FAC

2026 Man · Cov Southern Combo 18 & Over - Women Night

14 players · average NTRP 2.83 / LOUISIANA

View scouting list →
Schedule3 upcoming
Sep 15 6:00 PM
Franco's Athletic Club
Oct 6 6:00 PM
Pelican Athletic Club
Oct 13 6:00 PM
Franco's Athletic Club

Flight standings for Cov Southern Combo 18 & Over - Women Night have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.56 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.89
Gail Miller
usually #3 Doubles 41%, also #2 Doubles 36% · published 3
2.75
Fran Dominique
usually #3 Doubles 59%, also #2 Doubles 23% · published 3
Allison Harrison
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.69
Patricia Borges
usually #2 Singles 57%, also #1 Doubles 21% · published
2.47
Catherine Davenport
usually #3 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 3
2.41
Angelique Nicotri
usually #3 Doubles 71%, also #1 Doubles 14% · published 2.5
2.18
Christina Marquardt
usually #2 Doubles 38%, also #3 Doubles 19% · published 2.5
Jennifer Harty
usually #1 Doubles 45%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
Michelle Branighan
usually #2 Doubles 58%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Raleigh Quinlan
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Rhoda Blaum
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Rhonda Dallimore
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
SHELLY GALLARDO
usually #2 Doubles 47%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Susan Bullock
usually #3 Doubles 39%, also #2 Doubles 37% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Susan Bullock + Michelle Branighan3256% gamesnot enough data
Susan Bullock + SHELLY GALLARDO033 matchesnot enough data
Susan Bullock + Catherine Davenport123 matchesnot enough data
SHELLY GALLARDO + Angelique Nicotri213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Gail Miller
31W–36L career · 22 lines in 2026
<1%81%19%
2.89
3
Fran Dominique
27W–26L career · 22 lines in 2026
3%95%3%
2.75
3
Allison Harrison
1W–1L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Patricia Borges
13W–11L career · 14 lines in 2026
0%8%92%
2.69
3
Catherine Davenport
7W–16L career · 12 lines in 2026
60%40%<1%
2.47
2.5
Angelique Nicotri
12W–17L career · 21 lines in 2026
0%75%25%
2.41
2.5
Christina Marquardt
2W–14L career · type S · 14 lines in 2026
0%99%1%
2.18
Jennifer Harty
5W–31L career · 20 lines in 2026
not enough data
Michelle Branighan
9W–17L career · 12 lines in 2026
not enough data
Raleigh Quinlan
1W–3L career · 4 lines in 2026
not enough data
Rhoda Blaum
7W–10L career · 15 lines in 2026
not enough data
Rhonda Dallimore
0W–5L career · 5 lines in 2026
not enough data
SHELLY GALLARDO
14W–55L career · 43 lines in 2026
not enough data
Susan Bullock
25W–47L career · 41 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.