Teams

Klocek/18s/5.5/PAC

2026 Man · Cov Southern Combo 18 & Over - Women Night

15 players · average NTRP 2.75 / LOUISIANA

View scouting list →
Schedule3 upcoming
Sep 15 6:00 PM
Franco's Athletic Club
Oct 6 7:30 PM
Pelican Athletic Club
Oct 13 6:00 PM
Coquille Park and Recreation

Flight standings for Cov Southern Combo 18 & Over - Women Night have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.44 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.67
Ellen Sweetman
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 32% · published 3
2.66
Beth Almond
usually #3 Doubles 53%, also #2 Doubles 41% · published 3
2.52
Diane Matherne
usually #3 Doubles 62%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.37
Ellie Bourgeois
usually #3 Doubles 36%, also #2 Doubles 27% · published 2.5
2.30
Addie Troxclair
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
2.10
Elizabeth Klocek
usually #1 Doubles 47%, also #3 Doubles 24% · published 2.5
Jennifer Steen
usually #2 Doubles 39%, also #3 Doubles 22% · published
Kathie Daigle
usually #1 Doubles 47%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Lauren Tagesen
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Lisa McCoy
usually #3 Doubles 63%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Maite Cardoso
usually #3 Doubles 28%, also #1 Singles 28% · published
Megan Baum
usually #2 Doubles 38%, also #2 Singles 25% · published
Melanie Olinde
usually #2 Doubles 59%, also #3 Doubles 24% · published
Taylor Comeaux
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Taylor Roessler
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Diane Matherne + Beth Almond9358% gamesnot enough data
Ellen Sweetman + Kathie Daigle4351% gamesnot enough data
Addie Troxclair + Jennifer Steen4257% gamesnot enough data
Melanie Olinde + Beth Almond134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Ellen Sweetman
22W–41L career · 28 lines in 2026
10%90%1%
2.67
3
Beth Almond
21W–18L career · 17 lines in 2026
11%89%<1%
2.66
3
Diane Matherne
18W–24L career · 21 lines in 2026
44%55%<1%
2.52
2.5
Ellie Bourgeois
5W–6L career · type S · 11 lines in 2026
0%84%16%
2.37
2.5
Addie Troxclair
16W–16L career · 17 lines in 2026
0%94%6%
2.30
2.5
Elizabeth Klocek
10W–24L career · 17 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.10
Jennifer Steen
13W–19L career · 18 lines in 2026
not enough data
Kathie Daigle
15W–17L career · 15 lines in 2026
not enough data
Lauren Tagesen
4W–9L career · 4 lines in 2026
not enough data
Lisa McCoy
8W–17L career · 8 lines in 2026
not enough data
Maite Cardoso
5W–13L career · 16 lines in 2026
not enough data
Megan Baum
14W–6L career · 8 lines in 2026
not enough data
Melanie Olinde
8W–29L career · 17 lines in 2026
not enough data
Taylor Comeaux
4W–6L career · 4 lines in 2026
not enough data
Taylor Roessler
10W–5L career · 4 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.