Teams

Guillet/18s/5.5/COQ

2026 Man · Cov Southern Combo 18 & Over - Women Night

9 players · average NTRP 2.70 / LOUISIANA

View scouting list →
Schedule3 upcoming · 2 played
Sep 15 6:00 PM
Beau Chene Country Club
Oct 6 6:00 PM
vs N/A
Jaime Guillet
Oct 13 6:00 PM
Coquille Park and Recreation
2026-09-08Lost 01
L#2 DoublesMelissa Lindelow / Kristen Nash vs Jennifer Harty / Christina Marquardt1-6, 2-6
2026-08-11Lost 01
L#1 DoublesAlyssa Varian / Jennifer Olivier vs Rebecca Sandoz / Sarah Sulzer0-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Cov Southern Combo 18 & Over - Women Night have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.51 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.86
Eryn Brannagan
usually #2 Doubles 64%, also #2 Singles 14% · published 3
2.56
Ana Munoz
usually #2 Doubles 47%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.35
Brittany Cunningham
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 2.5
2.29
Jaime Guillet
usually #3 Doubles 56%, also #2 Doubles 44% · published 2.5
Alyssa Varian
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Jennifer Olivier
usually #3 Doubles 71%, also #1 Doubles 19% · published
Kristen Nash
usually #2 Doubles 56%, also #3 Doubles 22% · published
Melissa Lindelow
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Soi Smith
usually #3 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jaime Guillet + Eryn Brannagan2835% gamesnot enough data
Soi Smith + Ana Munoz0636% gamesnot enough data
Jaime Guillet + Brittany Cunningham3350% gamesnot enough data
Soi Smith + Jennifer Olivier2341% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Eryn Brannagan
14W–22L career · 21 lines in 2026
<1%86%14%
2.86
3
Ana Munoz
2W–13L career · type S · 15 lines in 2026
34%66%<1%
2.56
2.5
Brittany Cunningham
5W–5L career · type S · 10 lines in 2026
0%88%12%
2.35
2.5
Jaime Guillet
9W–26L career · 18 lines in 2026
0%95%5%
2.29
2.5
Alyssa Varian
0W–1L career · type S · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Jennifer Olivier
6W–32L career · 21 lines in 2026
not enough data
Kristen Nash
6W–12L career · 9 lines in 2026
not enough data
Melissa Lindelow
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Soi Smith
3W–13L career · 14 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.