Teams

Team 2

2022 NOVA Combo Mixed · NOVA Combo Mixed 9.5

14 players · average NTRP 4.80 / VIRGINIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2022-11-06vs Team 1Won 10
W#1 DoublesAustin Longacre / Erika Trost vs Erin Swaller / William McDevitt6-3, 6-3
2022-10-26vs Team 1Lost 01
L#2 DoublesErika Trost / Tyler Ault vs Leila Lam / Brian Randolph3-6, 3-6
2022-10-15Lost 01
L#1 DoublesCasey Burdette / Laith Layous vs Erin Swaller / Brian Randolph3-6, 4-6
2022-10-07Won 10
W#1 DoublesAustin Longacre / Danielle Desfosses vs Nicholas Cittadino / Caitlin Young6-0, 6-3
2022-10-02vs Team 1Lost 02
L#1 DoublesAustin Longacre / Erika Trost vs Erin Swaller / Rory Smith3-6, 6-0, 0-1
L#2 DoublesMasood Ahmed / Danielle Desfosses vs Brian Randolph / Eve Helmer3-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for NOVA Combo Mixed 9.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.54 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.92
Austin Longacre
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 5
4.85
Lorena Valente
published
4.79
Angel Batkins
published 5
Elizabeth Larson
published 5
4.59
Casey Burdette
published 5
4.58
Erika Trost
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 5
4.46
Danielle Desfosses
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 5
4.29
Laith Layous
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
Cheryl Driscoll
published 4.5
4.22
Kyle Truong
published
4.12
Tyler Ault
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
John Mook
published
Kenny Callender
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Laith Layous + Erika Trost6355% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Austin Longacre
64W–25L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%73%27%
4.92
Lorena Valente
12W–4L career · no lines in 2022
<1%87%13%
4.85
5
Angel Batkins
13W–7L career · no lines in 2022
1%93%6%
4.79
5
Elizabeth Larson
4W–7L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
5
Casey Burdette
7W–10L career · no lines in 2022
25%75%<1%
4.59
5
Erika Trost
383W–194L career · 6 lines in 2022
27%73%<1%
4.58
5
Danielle Desfosses
131W–61L career · 2 lines in 2022
61%39%<1%
4.46
4.5
Laith Layous
176W–114L career · 1 line in 2022
1%93%6%
4.29
4.5
Cheryl Driscoll
5W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
4.5
Elizabeth Vermillion
12W–15L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Kyle Truong
6W–1L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
4.22
4.5
Tyler Ault
43W–26L career · 1 line in 2022
19%81%<1%
4.12
John Mook
14W–9L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Kenny Callender
3W–3L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.