← Search

Angel Batkins

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Columbia, MD
5.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
406 matches · 328W–78L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history406 matches
L
2026-05-09 · Jakubik · #1 Doubles · 5.0 · with Miranda Bishard
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-04-25 · #1 Doubles · 5.0 · with Kun Teng TCHE mixed championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L
2026-04-25 · #1 Doubles · 5.0 · with Kun Teng TCHE mixed championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-04-19 · Jakubik · #1 Doubles · 5.0 · with Alexandria Agee
loading the estimate
1-6, 5-5
W
2026-04-12 · Jakubik · #2 Doubles · 5.0 · with Danielle Desfosses
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-04-11 · Vissering - Mixed Groundies & Lobs · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Renaldo Savady mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 2-6, 0-1
W
2026-04-02 · Vissering - Grounded & Lobs · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Lydia Juh
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-03-26 · Vissering - Grounded & Lobs · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Lydia Juh
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-1
W
Default
2026-03-20 · Vissering · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Renaldo Savady mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-03-14 · Chaney/Helmer · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Alan Chaney mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-0
W
2026-03-01 · Chaney/Helmer · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Justin Cady mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-02-14 · Chaney/Helmer · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Justin Cady mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams104 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level20 levels played
3.0
100%
10W–0L · 73.8% of games
3.5
100%
16W–0L · 63.8% of games
4.0
95.2%
20W–1L · 73.8% of games
4.5
81.8%
45W–10L · 64.5% of games
5.0
52%
13W–12L · 51.3% of games
7.5
100%
5W–0L · 85.7% of games
8.5
95.2%
20W–1L · 68.1% of games
9.5
83.3%
5W–1L · 61.1% of games
10.0mixed
66.7%
10W–5L · 56.2% of games
3.0mixed
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.5mixed
75%
3W–1L · 65.8% of games
4.5mixed
100%
10W–0L · 65.1% of games
5.0mixed
66.7%
6W–3L · 52.2% of games
6.5mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.5mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
78.4%
29W–8L · 63.7% of games
8.5mixed
78.3%
18W–5L · 64.6% of games
9.0mixed
78.8%
93W–25L · 61.1% of games
9.5mixed
73.9%
17W–6L · 56.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 54% of the time
#1 Doubles
54%
220 matches
#2 Doubles
29%
116 matches
#3 Doubles
17%
67 matches
#1 Singles
1%
2 matches
#2 Singles
0%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer