Teams

Miller/18/2.5/WD/QTC

2025 Shrev-Boss Adult 18 & Over - Women Day · 2.5 Shrev

7 players · average NTRP 2.50 / LOUISIANA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-04-02vs Coke/18/2.5/WD/QTCWon 20
W#1 DoublesLiz Navarre / Ainsley Rutkowski vs Angelika Carioca / Harrice Daniels6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesLindsey Miller / Laura Colvin vs Sumer Cooner / Carie Rives-Vickery5-7, 6-1, 1-0
2025-03-19vs Green-Miller/18/2.5/WD/BTCLost 03
L#1 DoublesLaura Colvin / Erendida Sands vs Rose Whittington / Kelli Shaw4-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#1 SinglesKayla Tyson vs Brook Miller1-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesAinsley Rutkowski / Liz Navarre vs Kristen Farmer / Wendy Jennings3-6, 3-6
2025-03-10vs Gibson-Coates/18/2.5/WD/BTCLost 03
L#1 DoublesKatie Dempsey / Laura Colvin vs HOLLY ELLIS / Shelly Boudreau2-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesJacie Wilson vs Elisha Coats4-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesLiz Navarre / Kayla Tyson vs Jacqueline Gibson / Kaitlin Wood1-6, 3-6
2025-03-05vs Gordon-Floyd/18/2.5/WD/QTCLost 03
L#1 DoublesLindsey Miller / Jacie Wilson vs Kay Holland / Ashley Covington4-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesAinsley Rutkowski vs Heather Floyd1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesErendida Sands / Katie Dempsey vs Marie Cote / Cathy Amy2-6, 0-6
2025-02-26vs VanZandt-DeAlba/18/2.5/WD/STCCWon 21
L#1 DoublesErendida Sands / Lindsey Miller vs Georgia McCotter / Gail Brown0-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesJacie Wilson vs Haley Hall6-3, 1-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesKayla Tyson / Ainsley Rutkowski vs Ruby DeAlba / Danielle Hilario2-6, 6-2, 1-0
2025-02-05vs Sample-Pasquier/18/2.5/WD/POTCLost 02
L#1 DoublesKatie Dempsey / Jacie Wilson vs Amanda Dickson / Alice Sample1-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesLiz Navarre / Kayla Tyson vs Amanda Haynie / Leigh Pasquier2-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5 Shrev have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.20 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.21
Jacie Wilson
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.21
Ainsley Rutkowski
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 2.5
2.18
Liz Navarre
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Erendida Sands
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Katie Dempsey
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Kayla Tyson
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
Lindsey Miller
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jacie Wilson
3W–11L career · 4 lines in 2025
0%98%2%
2.21
2.5
Ainsley Rutkowski
3W–7L career · 4 lines in 2025
0%98%2%
2.21
Liz Navarre
13W–15L career · 4 lines in 2025
0%99%1%
2.18
Erendida Sands
0W–3L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Katie Dempsey
0W–3L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Kayla Tyson
1W–3L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Lindsey Miller
1W–2L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.