Teams

Coke/18/2.5/WD/QTC

2025 Shrev-Boss Adult 18 & Over - Women Day · 2.5 Shrev

7 players · average NTRP 2.50 / LOUISIANA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-04-02vs Miller/18/2.5/WD/QTCLost 02
L#1 DoublesAngelika Carioca / Harrice Daniels vs Liz Navarre / Ainsley Rutkowski2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesSumer Cooner / Carie Rives-Vickery vs Lindsey Miller / Laura Colvin7-5, 1-6, 0-1
2025-03-26vs VanZandt-DeAlba/18/2.5/WD/STCCLost 03
L#1 DoublesAngelika Carioca / Salinda Barnard vs Gail Brown / Georgia McCotter0-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesSumer Cooner vs Haley Hall7-5, 3-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesJuanita Coke / Rana El-Hayek vs Danielle Hilario / Ruby DeAlba3-6, 2-6
2025-03-20vs Gibson-Coates/18/2.5/WD/BTCLost 03
L#1 DoublesSalinda Barnard / Rana El-Hayek vs Meghan Brown / Jacqueline Gibson1-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesCarie Rives-Vickery vs Elisha Coats0-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesAngelika Carioca / Juanita Coke vs Shelly Boudreau / Kaitlin Wood1-6, 0-6
2025-02-26vs Sample-Pasquier/18/2.5/WD/POTCLost 02
L#1 DoublesSalinda Barnard / Carie Rives-Vickery vs Leigh Pasquier / Kristen Watters0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesRana El-Hayek / Sumer Cooner vs Alice Byington / Taylor Ferrell1-6, 2-6
2025-02-12vs Green-Miller/18/2.5/WD/BTCLost 02
L#1 DoublesJuanita Coke / Carie Rives-Vickery vs Kelli Shaw / Rose Whittington3-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesSalinda Barnard / Sumer Cooner vs Kristen Farmer / Wendy Jennings2-6, 2-6
2025-02-05vs Gordon-Floyd/18/2.5/WD/QTCLost 03
L#1 DoublesAngelika Carioca / Carie Rives-Vickery vs Marie Cote / Kay Holland0-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesSumer Cooner vs Heather Floyd1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesSalinda Barnard / Rana El-Hayek vs Cathy Amy / Lauren Price0-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5 Shrev have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Angelika Carioca
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 2.5
Carie Rives-Vickery
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #1 Singles 20% · published 2.5
Harrice Daniels
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Juanita Coke
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Rana El-Hayek
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Salinda Barnard
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
Sumer Cooner
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Singles 40% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

2.5
Angelika Carioca
0W–4L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
2.5
Carie Rives-Vickery
0W–5L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data
2.5
Harrice Daniels
0W–1L career · type S · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Juanita Coke
1W–6L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Rana El-Hayek
0W–4L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Salinda Barnard
0W–5L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data
Sumer Cooner
14W–21L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.