Teams

TTC - Taylor

2022 Brevard Trilevel · 3.0

7 players · average NTRP 3.25 / REGION_4

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-10-16vs Suntree - SaundersWon 21
L#1 DoublesJan Johnson / Danielle Hyatt vs Lori Ewing / Margaret Staples3-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesLynne Schettino-DeFelice / Carol Becker vs Sandra Rowe / Nancy Charitat2-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJanis Mena / Suzanne Taylor vs Darien Lawrence / Nancy Hastings6-7, 6-3, 1-0
2022-10-09vs Brevard/Desoto - LauLost 02
L#1 DoublesDanielle Hyatt / Diana Fuchs vs Gillian Dionne / Nancy Sharp0-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesJune Leiter / Emily Criste vs Iliana Bleau / Suzanne Kube1-6, 1-6
2022-09-25vs Suntree - SaundersLost 01
L#2 DoublesLynne Schettino-DeFelice / Emily Criste vs Nancy Fischer / Sharon Bean4-6, 4-6
2022-09-18Lost 02
L#1 DoublesLynne Schettino-DeFelice / Danielle Hyatt vs Nancy Sharp / Maegan Hulscher0-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesSandra Edwards / Emily Criste vs Phyllis O'Toole / Sara Hatfield6-1, 3-6, 0-1
2022-08-28vs Suntree - SaundersLost 12
L#1 DoublesDiana Fuchs / Danielle Hyatt vs Amy Gregory / Lori Ewing0-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesCarol Becker / Lynne Schettino-DeFelice vs Nancy Fischer / Dana Saunders6-4, 7-5
L#3 DoublesJune Leiter / Janis Mena vs Amira Tolles / Nancy Hastings1-6, 1-6
2022-08-21vs Brevard/Desoto - LauLost 03
L#1 DoublesDanielle Hyatt / Ela Krebs vs Nancy Sharp / Rachel Weeks1-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesCarol Becker / Cindy Cozad vs Phyllis O'Toole / Amy McIntosh4-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesKaren Kelly / Emily Criste vs Deena Helton / Arletha White3-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.02 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.30
Danielle Hyatt
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.15
Emily Criste
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.09
Sandra Edwards
published
3.06
Janis Mena
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.89
Lynne Schettino-DeFelice
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.85
June Leiter
published
2.84
Cindy Cozad
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Janis Mena + Lynne Schettino-DeFelice1436% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Danielle Hyatt
65W–82L career · 5 lines in 2022
1%93%6%
3.30
3.5
Emily Criste
81W–155L career · 4 lines in 2022
13%87%<1%
3.15
Sandra Edwards
5W–9L career · no lines in 2022
25%75%<1%
3.09
3
Janis Mena
73W–58L career · type A · 2 lines in 2022
<1%32%68%
3.06
Lynne Schettino-DeFelice
63W–154L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%80%20%
2.89
June Leiter
1W–2L career · no lines in 2022
88%12%<1%
2.85
3
Cindy Cozad
51W–44L career · 1 line in 2022
<1%89%10%
2.84

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.