Teams

Brevard/Desoto - Lau

2022 Brevard Trilevel · 3.0

12 players · average NTRP 3.60 / REGION_4

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-10-09vs TTC - TaylorWon 20
W#1 DoublesGillian Dionne / Nancy Sharp vs Danielle Hyatt / Diana Fuchs6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesIliana Bleau / Suzanne Kube vs June Leiter / Emily Criste6-1, 6-1
2022-10-02vs Suntree - SaundersLost 01
L#3 DoublesCarol Whalen / Suzanne Kube vs Nancy Hastings / Mandy Smith2-6, 7-6, 0-1
2022-09-18vs TTC - TaylorWon 10
W#3 DoublesCarol Whalen / Suzanne Kube vs Karen Kelly / June Leiter7-5, 6-7, 1-0
2022-09-11vs Suntree - SaundersLost 01
L#3 DoublesArletha White / Deena Helton vs Amira Tolles / Darien Lawrence0-6, 1-6
2022-08-21vs TTC - TaylorWon 10
W#3 DoublesDeena Helton / Arletha White vs Karen Kelly / Emily Criste6-3, 6-3
2022-08-14vs Suntree - SaundersWon 20
W#1 DoublesGillian Dionne / Erin Herring vs Deanna Rehak / Jami Cohen6-3, 6-1
W#3 DoublesIliana Bleau / Deena Helton vs Jeannie Fox Craig / Darien Lawrence6-1, 4-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.38 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.08
Maegan Hulscher
published 4
3.73
Stacie Neff
published 4
3.65
Gillian Dionne
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.61
Rachel Weeks
published
3.55
Cheri McLachlan
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.49
Sara Hatfield
published
3.28
Iliana Bleau
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.25
Amy McIntosh
published 3.5
3.16
Deena Helton
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.06
Cristi Lau
published 3.5
2.95
Suzanne Kube
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.74
Arletha White
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Iliana Bleau + Deena Helton13659% games+8.9% vs expected
Suzanne Kube + Deena Helton8754% games−4.0% vs expected
Arletha White + Deena Helton18955% gamesnot enough data
Arletha White + Suzanne Kube9852% gamesnot enough data
Arletha White + Iliana Bleau2547% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Maegan Hulscher
139W–50L career · no lines in 2022
<1%26%74%
4.08
4
Stacie Neff
63W–32L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.73
4
Gillian Dionne
95W–75L career · 2 lines in 2022
12%88%<1%
3.65
Rachel Weeks
4W–8L career · no lines in 2022
20%80%<1%
3.61
4
Cheri McLachlan
158W–138L career · 5 lines in 2022
34%66%<1%
3.55
Sara Hatfield
2W–2L career · no lines in 2022
53%47%<1%
3.49
3.5
Iliana Bleau
109W–93L career · 2 lines in 2022
2%94%5%
3.28
3.5
Amy McIntosh
14W–12L career · no lines in 2022
3%95%3%
3.25
3.5
Deena Helton
152W–88L career · 3 lines in 2022
11%89%<1%
3.16
3.5
Cristi Lau
51W–75L career · no lines in 2022
33%67%<1%
3.06
3
Suzanne Kube
117W–87L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%66%34%
2.95
3
Arletha White
108W–132L career · 2 lines in 2022
3%94%2%
2.74

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.