Teams

Love All

2026 Corpus Christi 55 & Over USTA League · Ladies 6.0

10 players · average NTRP 3.00 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2026-03-17vs Older & WiserLost 12
L#1 DoublesDeborah Johnson / Wes Horn vs Christie Leblanc / Vicki Jamison0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesBeatrice Villarreal / Beverly Montgomery vs Brenda Worsham / Margot Hopkins2-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesSharon Harral / Barbarra McMinn Gonzales vs Mary Deeann Gabro / Cathy Dooley3-6, 6-3, 1-0
2026-03-10vs Cheaper than TherapyWon 10
W#3 DoublesChimene Burnett / Sharon Harral vs Melanie Beyer / Sandra Vasquez6-0, 6-2
2026-02-24vs Older & WiserLost 03
L#1 DoublesChimene Burnett / Barbarra McMinn Gonzales vs Mary Deeann Gabro / Christie Leblanc1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesDana Allen / Beverly Montgomery vs Margot Hopkins / Brenda Worsham3-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesRosario Martinez / Cynthia Winkley vs Debbie Ellwood / Laura Bartlett2-6, 1-6
2026-02-17vs Cheaper than TherapyWon 10
W#1 DoublesChimene Burnett / Barbarra McMinn Gonzales vs Celista Halpert / Carron Rapach6-1, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Ladies 6.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.80 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.97
Barbarra McMinn Gonzales
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.92
Beverly Montgomery
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.89
Sharon Harral
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.85
Rosario Martinez
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.82
Dana Allen
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.80
Chimene Burnett
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.78
Beatrice Villarreal
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.67
Cynthia Winkley
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.65
Aurora Robles
published 3
2.62
Wes Horn
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Chimene Burnett + Barbarra McMinn Gonzales6947% games−4.5% vs expected
Rosario Martinez + Barbarra McMinn Gonzales314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Barbarra McMinn Gonzales
36W–45L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%58%42%
2.97
3
Beverly Montgomery
24W–16L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%71%29%
2.92
Sharon Harral
3W–5L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%78%21%
2.89
Rosario Martinez
19W–21L career · 1 line in 2026
1%85%15%
2.85
3
Dana Allen
18W–8L career · 1 line in 2026
1%89%10%
2.82
3
Chimene Burnett
24W–26L career · 3 lines in 2026
2%91%8%
2.80
3
Beatrice Villarreal
24W–44L career · 1 line in 2026
2%92%6%
2.78
3
Cynthia Winkley
4W–15L career · 1 line in 2026
11%88%1%
2.67
3
Aurora Robles
10W–5L career · no lines in 2026
13%86%1%
2.65
Wes Horn
13W–26L career · 1 line in 2026
21%79%<1%
2.62

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.