Teams

CDTA S 18&OW4.0 2.Tam Wright Fri 7 $22

1Summer 18&O WN · WE

21 players · average NTRP 4.00 / CHICAGO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
L#1 DoublesKatherine Martin / Claudia Ma vs Ana Chang / Tracy Reece7-6, 1-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesSara Olson / Kim Kuwabara vs Kate Currier / Lydia Doyle5-7, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesMelissa Schopin / Elleson Song vs Elizabeth Burns / Cris Montresor3-6, 4-6
W#1 DoublesClaudia Ma / Allison Goldberg vs Leigh Keyser / Tiffany Carpenter6-3, 6-1
L#2 SinglesClaudia Moscoso-Cordero vs Lisa Foster5-7, 3-2, 0-1
W#1 DoublesClaudia Ma / Crystal Leighton vs Erin Wyatt / Lara Phillips6-3, 6-4
W#2 SinglesMelissa Robinson vs Roxana Aleksic2-6, 7-6
W#3 DoublesPatricia Bustamante / Martha Davis vs Erica Eisner / Anne Feely3-6, 4-2, 1-0
W#1 DoublesAllison Goldberg / Katherine Martin vs Kelly Castriotta / Johanna Raimond6-2, 7-5
W#2 DoublesSara Olson / Kim Kuwabara vs Courtney Conway / Christine Marschall6-2, 6-4
W#1 DoublesAllison Goldberg / Crystal Leighton vs Jeanine Stathopoulos / Liza Spinazze6-2, 6-0
W#2 DoublesMelissa Robinson / Kim Kuwabara vs Michelle Ramker / Rachel Fuller7-5, 6-0
W#2 SinglesClaudia Moscoso-Cordero vs Virginia Kosenkova6-3, 6-5
W#1 SinglesElleson Song vs KAREN MAJERCZAK6-3, 7-6
W#2 DoublesCrystal Leighton / Martha Davis vs Meshelle Rich / Jessica Gross6-1, 6-0
L#3 DoublesJackie Smith / Sara Olson vs Hillary Cohen / Anne Ryan1-6, 6-2, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings8 teams · WE
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1CDTA S 18&OW4.0 1.Tam Lund Tue 7 $226129615226
2CDTA S 18&OW4.0 2.Tam Wright Fri 7 $225122820220
3CDTA S 18&OW4.0 8.MTB Breger Tue 6:30 $2942171330246
4CDTA S 18&OW4.0 3.FV Lytle Thu 7 $2543161940276
5CDTA S 18&OW4.0 7.Nielsen Lund Sun 5 $2243142147330
6CDTA S 18&OW4.0 6.Wilm Nemec Thu 7 $2034142144322
7CDTA S 18&OW4.0 5.Gnbk Meyer Tue 6:30 $3016122352343
8CDTA S 18&OW4.0 4.Nielsen Bergman Sun 3 $2207112450351

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.82 estimated across 18 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.16
Kim Kuwabara
published 4
4.12
Claudia Ma
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
4.08
Crystal Leighton
published 4
3.98
Huan Chang
published
3.96
Ginger Riessen
published 4
3.90
Anne Ordway
published 4
3.88
Allison Goldberg
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.88
3.86
Melissa Schopin
published 4
3.84
Susan Thornquist
published 4
3.81
ANDREA TAHLIER
published 4
3.75
Sara Olson
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.69
Claudia Moscoso-Cordero
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 4
3.68
3.66
Michele Berman
published
3.55
Martha Davis
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.52
Rebecca Daly
published
3.49
Melissa Robinson
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Elleson Song
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
Jackie Smith
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Martha Davis + Crystal Leighton8075% games+21.1% vs expected
Martha Davis + Allison Goldberg9458% games+13.3% vs expected
Martha Davis + Ginger Riessen5160% games+11.3% vs expected
Allison Goldberg + Crystal Leighton5360% games+9.8% vs expected
Claudia Ma + Crystal Leighton11069% games+6.1% vs expected
Martha Davis + Rebecca Daly7260% games+5.6% vs expected
Allison Goldberg + Melissa Schopin8357% games+4.7% vs expected
Melissa Robinson + Kim Kuwabara12264% games+3.3% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Kim Kuwabara
174W–33L career · no lines in 2026
<1%13%87%
4.16
4
Claudia Ma
41W–13L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%19%81%
4.12
4
Crystal Leighton
308W–80L career · no lines in 2026
<1%30%70%
4.08
Huan Chang
178W–130L career · no lines in 2026
<1%57%43%
3.98
4
Ginger Riessen
244W–127L career · no lines in 2026
<1%61%38%
3.96
4
Anne Ordway
77W–67L career · no lines in 2026
<1%77%23%
3.90
4
Allison Goldberg
126W–78L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%80%19%
3.88
4
Sophia Chang Stauffer
97W–66L career · no lines in 2026
<1%81%19%
3.88
4
Melissa Schopin
103W–40L career · no lines in 2026
<1%83%16%
3.86
4
Susan Thornquist
51W–72L career · no lines in 2026
1%86%13%
3.84
4
ANDREA TAHLIER
86W–27L career · no lines in 2026
1%90%9%
3.81
Sara Olson
131W–57L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%<1%>99%
3.75
4
Claudia Moscoso-Cordero
48W–45L career · 2 lines in 2026
9%90%1%
3.69
4
Patricia Bustamante
123W–102L career · no lines in 2026
10%89%1%
3.68
Michele Berman
27W–23L career · no lines in 2026
13%86%1%
3.66
Martha Davis
321W–153L career · 2 lines in 2026
35%65%<1%
3.55
Rebecca Daly
121W–136L career · no lines in 2026
43%56%<1%
3.52
Melissa Robinson
91W–34L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%<1%>99%
3.49
Elleson Song
74W–29L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Fra Angelica Farinas- Wright
62W–25L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Jackie Smith
54W–17L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.