Teams

CDTA S 18&OW4.0 7.Nielsen Lund Sun 5 $22

1Summer 18&O WN · WE

21 players · average NTRP 3.93 / CHICAGO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
L#1 DoublesLeigh Keyser / Tiffany Carpenter vs Claudia Ma / Allison Goldberg3-6, 1-6
2026-06-30Won 10
W#3 DoublesAmy Byrne / Missy Frank vs Kara Glassman / Esther Vorovich6-4, 6-3
W#1 DoublesLeigh Keyser / Caitlin McCormick vs Alexandra Gorodiski / Antje Boeing6-1, 6-2
W#1 DoublesCaitlin McCormick / Leigh Keyser vs Reatha Kay / Rachel Fuller6-3, 5-3
L#1 SinglesDanielle Patrow vs Krista Klund3-6, 0-1
W#1 DoublesLeigh Keyser / Tiffany Carpenter vs Dawn Baumann / Susan Ferris2-6, 6-4, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings8 teams · WE
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1CDTA S 18&OW4.0 1.Tam Lund Tue 7 $226129615226
2CDTA S 18&OW4.0 2.Tam Wright Fri 7 $225122820220
3CDTA S 18&OW4.0 8.MTB Breger Tue 6:30 $2942171330246
4CDTA S 18&OW4.0 3.FV Lytle Thu 7 $2543161940276
5CDTA S 18&OW4.0 7.Nielsen Lund Sun 5 $2243142147330
6CDTA S 18&OW4.0 6.Wilm Nemec Thu 7 $2034142144322
7CDTA S 18&OW4.0 5.Gnbk Meyer Tue 6:30 $3016122352343
8CDTA S 18&OW4.0 4.Nielsen Bergman Sun 3 $2207112450351

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.69 estimated across 17 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.02
Caitlin McCormick
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.99
Tiffany Carpenter
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.93
Leigh Keyser
published 4
3.85
Silvia Kusaka
published 4
3.83
Rebecca Kosner
published 4
3.80
Joanne Lund
published 4
Amy Byrne
published 4
3.71
Emily Paris
published
3.68
Danielle Patrow
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4
3.67
Missy Frank
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.65
Hilary Hoye
published 4
3.58
Martha Lloyd
published 4
3.56
Andrea Carrier
published 4
3.56
Linh Bailey
published 4
3.54
Janine Sheridan
published 4
3.46
3.42
Apple Naughton
published 3.5
3.41
Abby Sarnoff
published 3.5
Kelly O'Donnell
published
Lisa Foster
published
Michelle Parks
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Janine Sheridan + Hilary Hoye8657% games+12.0% vs expected
Hilary Hoye + Leigh Keyser4456% games+10.8% vs expected
Linh Bailey + Apple Naughton9655% games+8.9% vs expected
Leigh Keyser + Caitlin McCormick6078% games+8.3% vs expected
Rebecca Kosner + Hilary Hoye3248% games+3.9% vs expected
Linh Bailey + Joanne Lund4158% games+3.7% vs expected
Martha Lloyd + Joanne Lund4257% games+3.7% vs expected
Joanne Lund + Hilary Hoye5554% games+3.2% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Caitlin McCormick
22W–2L career · type S · 2 lines in 2026
<1%43%57%
4.02
Tiffany Carpenter
19W–4L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%53%47%
3.99
4
Leigh Keyser
98W–48L career · type A · no lines in 2026
<1%69%31%
3.93
4
Silvia Kusaka
232W–160L career · no lines in 2026
1%85%14%
3.85
4
Rebecca Kosner
96W–53L career · no lines in 2026
1%88%11%
3.83
4
Joanne Lund
172W–88L career · no lines in 2026
2%91%7%
3.80
4
Amy Byrne
55W–28L career · type A · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Emily Paris
57W–14L career · no lines in 2026
6%92%2%
3.71
4
Danielle Patrow
15W–19L career · 1 line in 2026
10%89%1%
3.68
Missy Frank
17W–32L career · 1 line in 2026
12%88%1%
3.67
4
Hilary Hoye
82W–55L career · no lines in 2026
14%85%1%
3.65
4
Martha Lloyd
201W–145L career · no lines in 2026
29%71%<1%
3.58
4
Andrea Carrier
19W–24L career · no lines in 2026
34%66%<1%
3.56
4
Linh Bailey
56W–52L career · no lines in 2026
35%65%<1%
3.56
4
Janine Sheridan
65W–64L career · no lines in 2026
38%62%<1%
3.54
4
Stephanie Remelius
75W–73L career · no lines in 2026
60%40%<1%
3.46
3.5
Apple Naughton
225W–194L career · no lines in 2026
<1%71%28%
3.42
3.5
Abby Sarnoff
52W–45L career · no lines in 2026
<1%74%26%
3.41
Kelly O'Donnell
77W–42L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Lisa Foster
1W–5L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Michelle Parks
45W–26L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.