Teams

LTA-Q RED

2024 USTA ADULT 40 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 4.0 - 40 & OVER

11 players · average NTRP 3.94 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-07-16vs RMTC BLUESplit 22
L#1 DoublesHilary Hartwig / Catherine Romero vs Jennifer Ufland / J Brockman1-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesRuta Cariov vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesDennette Stroh / Jody Reenan vs Ruth Weinberg / Cara Hoving0-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJulie Stockert / Debra Heiser vs Monica Blanco / Heather Smith2-6, 3-6
2024-07-09vs BRMST REDSplit 22
L#1 DoublesDebra Heiser / Julie Stockert vs Noelle Anthony / Jeanne Peoples1-6, 5-7
W#1 SinglesRuta Cariov vs Sue Vanderberg6-0, 6-0
L#2 DoublesCatherine Romero / Jody Reenan vs Kim Graves / Meghan Vogel7-6, 4-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesMaureen Hartigan / Dennette Stroh vs Jane Davis / Kathy Schmidt7-5, 7-6
2024-07-02vs LAC REDLost 03
L#1 DoublesMaureen Hartigan / Dennette Stroh vs Ursula Geiger / Kelly Mcreynolds1-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesRuta Cariov vs Mona Jones1-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#2 DoublesCatherine Romero / Julie Stockert vs Lisa Tran / Jean Crawford3-6, 2-6
2024-06-25vs MEA NAVYLost 04
L#1 DoublesDennette Stroh / Jody Reenan vs Christie Deluca / Tanya Goble2-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesRuta Cariov vs Lucy Kuchta5-7, 3-6
L#2 DoublesCatherine Romero / Maureen Hartigan vs Julie Schoenfeld / Thanyanat LeBlang1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesJulie Stockert / Teri Ohan vs Mary Kaiser / Libby O'Neill1-6, 4-6
2024-06-18vs LTA-Q ORANGELost 12
W#1 DoublesJody Reenan / Catherine Romero vs Robin Galloway / Anita Taylor6-2, 6-2
L#2 DoublesMaureen Hartigan / Dennette Stroh vs Christina Cope / Joyce Kelly2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesDebra Heiser / Julie Stockert vs Veronique Foulon / Michelle Pulley3-6, 3-6
2024-06-11vs RMTC BLUESplit 22
L#1 DoublesHilary Hartwig / Debra Heiser vs Heather Smith / Jennifer Ufland3-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesRuta Cariov vs Julie Simmonds6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesMaureen Hartigan / Dennette Stroh vs Kim Ferry / Ruth Weinberg6-1, 6-3
L#3 DoublesLogan Newens / Julie Stockert vs J Brockman / Cara Hoving2-6, 3-6
2024-06-04vs BRMST REDLost 12
L#1 DoublesHilary Hartwig / Julie Stockert vs Meghan Vogel / Stacey Mari1-6, 6-2, 0-1
W#2 DoublesDennette Stroh / Debra Heiser vs Jeanne Peoples / Sue Vanderberg6-3, 6-3
L#3 DoublesMaureen Hartigan / Jody Reenan vs Leslie Lewis / Noelle Anthony2-6, 6-3, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 4.0 - 40 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.64 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.01
Hilary Hartwig
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.77
Justine Barone
published 4
3.76
Ruta Cariov
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4
3.73
Jody Reenan
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.66
Teri Ohan
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.65
Maureen Hartigan
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.62
Dennette Stroh
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 4
3.60
Catherine Romero
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.52
Debra Heiser
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.14
Julie Stockert
usually #3 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published
Logan Newens
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jody Reenan + Hilary Hartwig6068% games+10.3% vs expected
Maureen Hartigan + Teri Ohan3450% games+9.8% vs expected
Dennette Stroh + Jody Reenan151253% games+5.4% vs expected
Dennette Stroh + Catherine Romero2351% games+5.4% vs expected
Dennette Stroh + Debra Heiser7950% games+2.9% vs expected
Maureen Hartigan + Hilary Hartwig4447% games+2.8% vs expected
Teri Ohan + Debra Heiser2349% games+1.4% vs expected
Maureen Hartigan + Debra Heiser5848% games+0.9% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Hilary Hartwig
98W–61L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%48%52%
4.01
4
Justine Barone
91W–55L career · no lines in 2024
2%94%4%
3.77
4
Ruta Cariov
68W–46L career · 5 lines in 2024
2%95%3%
3.76
4
Jody Reenan
132W–84L career · 5 lines in 2024
4%94%2%
3.73
4
Teri Ohan
29W–55L career · type A · 1 line in 2024
11%88%<1%
3.66
4
Maureen Hartigan
74W–97L career · 6 lines in 2024
13%87%<1%
3.65
4
Dennette Stroh
58W–54L career · 7 lines in 2024
17%83%<1%
3.62
4
Catherine Romero
86W–80L career · 5 lines in 2024
22%78%<1%
3.60
3.5
Debra Heiser
111W–88L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%45%55%
3.52
Julie Stockert
29W–67L career · 7 lines in 2024
14%86%<1%
3.14
Logan Newens
13W–23L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.