Teams

LAC RED

2024 USTA ADULT 40 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 4.0 - 40 & OVER

12 players · average NTRP 4.00 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-07-16vs BRMST REDWon 31
W#1 DoublesElizabeth Korniczky / Kelly Mcreynolds vs Jeanne Peoples / Meghan Vogel6-1, 6-2
L#1 SinglesLisa Tran vs Noelle Anthony2-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesJean Crawford / Gretchen Blair vs Jill Long / Jane Davis6-4, 6-1
W#3 DoublesMona Jones / Kim Kadlic vs Kim Graves / Kathy Schmidt6-3, 6-1
2024-07-09vs LTA-Q ORANGEWon 31
W#1 DoublesUrsula Geiger / Lisa Tran vs Christina Finkel / Diana Hefner6-3, 6-3
W#1 SinglesMona Jones vs Irina Schwarzburg4-6, 6-1, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJean Crawford / Gretchen Blair vs Robin Galloway / Joyce Kelly4-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesKim Kadlic / Lydia Wuensch vs Adele Reester / Priscilla Dana7-5, 6-4
2024-07-02vs LTA-Q REDWon 40
W#1 DoublesUrsula Geiger / Kelly Mcreynolds vs Maureen Hartigan / Dennette Stroh6-1, 6-3
W#1 SinglesMona Jones vs Ruta Cariov6-1, 5-7, 1-0
W#2 DoublesLisa Tran / Jean Crawford vs Catherine Romero / Julie Stockert6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesPaula Nelsen / Elizabeth Korniczky vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2024-06-25vs RMTC BLUEWon 31
W#1 DoublesChristine Payne / Kelly Mcreynolds vs Jennifer Ufland / J Brockman6-2, 2-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesMona Jones vs Cara Hoving6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesKim Kadlic / Elizabeth Korniczky vs Ruth Weinberg / Julie Simmonds6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesElena Kennedy / Gretchen Blair vs Kim Ferry / Heather Smith6-2, 6-2
2024-06-18vs MEA NAVYLost 04
L#1 DoublesUrsula Geiger / Jean Crawford vs Karina Hauser / Monika King5-7, 6-4, 0-1
L#1 SinglesGretchen Blair vs Christie Deluca2-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesKim Kadlic / Lydia Wuensch vs Thanyanat LeBlang / Libby O'Neill2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesPaula Nelsen / Elizabeth Korniczky vs Amy Novak / Lucy Kuchta7-6, 5-7, 0-1
2024-06-11vs BRMST REDWon 31
W#1 DoublesUrsula Geiger / Elizabeth Korniczky vs Jane Davis / Meghan Vogel4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#1 SinglesLisa Tran vs Stacey Mari5-7, 6-7
W#2 DoublesLydia Wuensch / Paula Nelsen vs Sue Vanderberg / Noelle Anthony6-4, 5-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJILLIAN HOLMSTROM / Jean Crawford vs Leslie Lewis / Kim Graves6-2, 6-1
2024-06-04vs LTA-Q ORANGEWon 31
W#1 DoublesChristine Payne / Kelly Mcreynolds vs Veronique Foulon / Christina Cope6-0, 6-3
W#1 SinglesLisa Tran vs Christina Finkel7-5, 6-0
W#2 DoublesGretchen Blair / Jean Crawford vs Robin Galloway / Diana Hefner7-6, 6-3
L#3 DoublesElena Kennedy / Paula Nelsen vs Michelle Pulley / Adele Reester6-1, 3-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 4.0 - 40 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.80 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.00
Gretchen Blair
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Singles 20% · published 4
3.97
Lisa Tran
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
3.93
JILLIAN HOLMSTROM
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.88
Kelly Mcreynolds
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.79
Jean Crawford
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 4
3.75
Elizabeth Korniczky
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 4
Elena Kennedy
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.73
Kim Kadlic
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.68
Mona Jones
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.68
Paula Nelsen
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.63
Lydia Wuensch
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
Ursula Geiger
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jean Crawford + Ursula Geiger4261% games+4.2% vs expected
Paula Nelsen + Elizabeth Korniczky15758% games+1.8% vs expected
Paula Nelsen + Lydia Wuensch4448% games+0.4% vs expected
Paula Nelsen + Mona Jones5259% games−2.3% vs expected
Paula Nelsen + Kelly Mcreynolds7362% games−4.2% vs expected
Lydia Wuensch + Kim Kadlic101050% games−4.3% vs expected
Kelly Mcreynolds + Lydia Wuensch8953% games−8.1% vs expected
Jean Crawford + Elizabeth Korniczky314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Gretchen Blair
37W–30L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%50%50%
4.00
Lisa Tran
39W–30L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%58%42%
3.97
4
JILLIAN HOLMSTROM
39W–21L career · 1 line in 2024
<1%71%29%
3.93
4
Kelly Mcreynolds
127W–50L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%83%17%
3.88
4
Jean Crawford
82W–41L career · 6 lines in 2024
1%93%6%
3.79
4
Elizabeth Korniczky
59W–46L career · 5 lines in 2024
3%95%3%
3.75
4
Elena Kennedy
9W–8L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Kim Kadlic
111W–67L career · 4 lines in 2024
4%94%2%
3.73
Mona Jones
67W–55L career · 4 lines in 2024
8%91%1%
3.68
4
Paula Nelsen
85W–49L career · 4 lines in 2024
8%91%1%
3.68
4
Lydia Wuensch
65W–52L career · 3 lines in 2024
16%83%<1%
3.63
Ursula Geiger
49W–13L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.