Teams

OC Dana Hills - Devon

2022 Adult 18 & Over - WEEKDAY WOMEN -OC · OC Women WD 4.0

10 players · average NTRP 4.00 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-06-24vs OC LLW MVTC - BondSplit 11
W#1 DoublesDevon Hogue / Maureen Hensley vs Terri Hamm / Mercedes Natvig4-6, 6-1, 1-0
L#2 DoublesAmy Cramer / Nina Berry vs Joleen Wells / Blake Spencer2-6, 3-6
L#1 DoublesAmy Cramer / Nina Berry vs SUSAN BROWN / Mieko KIMURA6-7, 0-6
L#2 DoublesDevon Hogue / Maureen Hensley vs Paula Nishibayashi / Judy Khang5-7, 7-6, 1-0
2022-05-31vs OC NBTC - GiannaWon 10
W#2 DoublesDevon Hogue / Lori McFerren vs Liz Abel / Gina Cereda6-0, 4-6, 1-0
2022-05-27vs OC LNRC - Net Assets - GinaLost 01
L#1 DoublesDevon Hogue / Kelly Dishno vs Regina Jacobs / Anne Marie Risquez-Tomasyan5-7, 1-6
2022-05-13vs OC FV/Agape Tennis - Susie RuizLost 01
L#1 DoublesLori McFerren / Nina Berry vs Mina Whitlock / Valentina Stepanova5-7, 6-1, 0-1
2022-05-06vs OC Coto de Caza - Ulrike 9:30amWon 10
W#1 DoublesAmy Cramer / Nina Berry vs Ulrike Leivici / Carol Teskey1-6, 7-6, 1-0
2022-04-15vs OC Lifetime SC - MerwinWon 10
W#2 DoublesNina Berry / Amy Cramer vs Marianne Richards / Amy Schetman6-3, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for OC Women WD 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.72 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.15
Nina Berry
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4.5
4.07
Devon Hogue
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.93
Lori McFerren
published
3.71
Kelly Dishno
published
3.63
Denise Banks
published 4
3.61
Jenny Tetley
published
3.60
Michelle Haghani
published
3.52
Amy Cramer
published 4
3.23
Holly Ferber
published 3.5
Lori Reimers
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Devon Hogue + Nina Berry9460% gamesnot enough data
Lori McFerren + Nina Berry213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Nina Berry
112W–64L career · 5 lines in 2022
13%87%<1%
4.15
4
Devon Hogue
73W–48L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%28%72%
4.07
Lori McFerren
24W–11L career · no lines in 2022
<1%71%29%
3.93
Kelly Dishno
8W–3L career · no lines in 2022
5%94%1%
3.71
4
Denise Banks
7W–19L career · no lines in 2022
17%83%<1%
3.63
Jenny Tetley
5W–3L career · no lines in 2022
21%79%<1%
3.61
Michelle Haghani
4W–7L career · no lines in 2022
21%79%<1%
3.60
4
Amy Cramer
2W–2L career · no lines in 2022
45%55%<1%
3.52
3.5
Holly Ferber
5W–7L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.23
Lori Reimers
1W–0L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.