Teams

OC Coto de Caza - Ulrike 9:30am

2022 Adult 18 & Over - WEEKDAY WOMEN -OC · OC Women WD 4.0

17 players · average NTRP 3.90 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-07-01vs OC Lifetime RSC - KellyWon 20
W#1 DoublesMelissa Brown / Alyse Mastropolo vs Michelle Duenas / Michelle Frohlich6-4, 6-2
W#2 SinglesTracie Reed-Furlong vs Ladawn Stone6-3, 6-7, 1-0
2022-06-24vs OC The Huntington Club - JoLost 01
L#3 DoublesAnn Rommel / Tracie Reed-Furlong vs Josephine Garrett / Mary Amen6-7, 3-6
2022-05-27Won 10
W#2 SinglesTracie Reed-Furlong vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-05-20vs OC FV/Agape Tennis - Susie RuizSplit 11
W#1 DoublesAlyse Mastropolo / Ulrike Leivici vs Stacy Tzur / Jody Brennan2-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#1 SinglesTracie Reed-Furlong vs Megan Riley1-6, 1-6
2022-05-10Lost 01
L#2 DoublesAmal Fatehi / Alyse Mastropolo vs Joleen Wells / Tracy Newman3-6, 6-3, 0-1
2022-05-06Lost 01
L#1 SinglesTracie Reed-Furlong vs Lisa Stone3-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for OC Women WD 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.66 estimated across 17 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.00
Christy Julianel
published 4.5
3.95
Alyse Mastropolo
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.89
Tammy Hyland
published
3.84
Melissa Regan
published
3.78
Ulrike Leivici
published
3.76
Tracie Reed-Furlong
usually #1 Singles 40%, also #2 Singles 40% · published 4
3.73
Vicki Hanna
published
3.72
Carol Teskey
published 4
3.71
3.70
Ann Rommel
published 4
3.66
Kelly Coste
published
3.64
Kathy Warren
published
3.52
Amal Fatehi
published 4
3.48
Deborah Todd
published 4
3.33
Cathy Field
published 3.5
3.25
Karah Curtis
published
3.21
Dianna Claton
published 3
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Christy Julianel
15W–7L career · no lines in 2022
51%49%<1%
4.00
4
Alyse Mastropolo
29W–17L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%64%36%
3.95
Tammy Hyland
7W–6L career · no lines in 2022
<1%81%19%
3.89
Melissa Regan
25W–19L career · no lines in 2022
<1%89%11%
3.84
Ulrike Leivici
9W–5L career · no lines in 2022
1%94%5%
3.78
4
Tracie Reed-Furlong
47W–34L career · 5 lines in 2022
2%94%3%
3.76
Vicki Hanna
4W–2L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.73
4
Carol Teskey
4W–2L career · no lines in 2022
5%94%1%
3.72
4
Allie Bertocchini
13W–7L career · no lines in 2022
5%93%1%
3.71
4
Ann Rommel
6W–4L career · no lines in 2022
6%93%1%
3.70
Kelly Coste
6W–8L career · no lines in 2022
11%88%<1%
3.66
Kathy Warren
5W–2L career · no lines in 2022
14%85%<1%
3.64
4
Amal Fatehi
0W–4L career · type S · no lines in 2022
45%55%<1%
3.52
4
Deborah Todd
7W–1L career · no lines in 2022
55%45%<1%
3.48
3.5
Cathy Field
16W–12L career · no lines in 2022
1%90%9%
3.33
Karah Curtis
1W–8L career · no lines in 2022
3%95%3%
3.25
3
Dianna Claton
3W–6L career · no lines in 2022
<1%6%94%
3.21

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.