Teams

OC The Huntington Club - Jo

2022 Adult 18 & Over - WEEKDAY WOMEN -OC · OC 3.5W WD

13 players · average NTRP 3.75 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule18 played
2022-07-08vs OC FV/Agape Tennis - Susie RuizWon 10
W#2 SinglesRosalinda Fazio vs Viviana Kim6-4, 6-4
2022-07-01vs OC Fullerton TC - WendyWon 20
W#2 DoublesSamantha Bloom / Lacey Seward vs Karen Tonelli / Melissa McCullough7-5, 6-4
W#2 SinglesCatherine Fullerton vs Nancy Bergman7-5, 5-7, 1-0
2022-06-24vs OC Coto de Caza - Ulrike 9:30amWon 10
W#2 DoublesRosalinda Fazio / Michelle Bachand vs Tammy Hyland / Melissa Regan6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2022-06-17vs OC Eldorado TC - LisaSplit 11
W#1 SinglesCatherine Fullerton vs Denise Vo6-2, 6-1
L#2 SinglesLacey Seward vs Kimberly Worrell6-3, 6-7, 0-1
2022-06-10vs OC Lifetime RSC - KellyLost 01
L#1 DoublesRosalinda Fazio / Jackie MacNew vs Tracey Fulford / Michelle Duenas6-2, 0-6, 0-1
2022-06-06vs OC - LNRC - Barb/LisaSplit 11
L#2 DoublesLacey Seward / Lisa Watkins vs Dayna Marinos / Jill Moro3-6, 3-6
W#2 SinglesCatherine Fullerton vs Mary Rosol6-1, 6-4
2022-06-03vs OC Lifetime SC - MerwinLost 01
L#1 SinglesRosalinda Fazio vs Annette Drake0-6, 1-6
2022-06-03vs OC LLW CMTC - NicoleSplit 11
L#2 SinglesCatherine Fullerton vs Kyrstin Oanh Ha2-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesSamantha Bloom / Lacey Seward vs Jenniffer Wong / Tammy Vuong6-2, 2-6, 1-0
2022-05-27Lost 01
L#1 SinglesRosalinda Fazio vs Diana Bond2-6, 3-6
2022-05-27vs OC MVTC - GeeLost 01
L#2 SinglesCatherine Fullerton vs JENNIFER BRASCH5-7, 7-6, 0-1
2022-05-20vs OC - LNRC - Barb/LisaLost 01
L#2 SinglesLacey Seward vs Jesstine Jones4-6, 1-6
2022-05-13vs OC Acers - YLCC - IreneLost 01
L#1 SinglesRosalinda Fazio vs Holly Bruning0-6, 2-6
2022-05-13vs OC Fullerton TC - WendyWon 10
W#2 DoublesJacqueline Jernigan / Catherine Fullerton vs Nancy Phillipi / Nancy Montez6-3, 6-2
L#1 SinglesRosalinda Fazio vs Linda Luk2-6, 4-6
2022-04-22vs OC NBTC - GiannaWon 10
W#1 DoublesRosalinda Fazio / Janna McConnell vs Jeannine Sandling / Gigi Farris6-4, 6-4
2022-04-22vs OC Lifetime - ChrissySplit 11
W#2 SinglesCatherine Fullerton vs Jill Behrle7-5, 6-2
L#3 DoublesMichelle Schmit / Lacey Seward vs Lauren Leabody / Tania Reed6-7, 1-6
2022-04-15vs OC LLW CMTC - NicoleLost 02
L#1 SinglesDana Dotoli vs Rosalinda Fazio - (DQ)*2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesCatherine Fullerton / Tiffany Pena vs Jenniffer Wong / Kyrstin Oanh Ha5-7, 4-6
2022-04-08Lost 01
L#2 SinglesDana Buckley vs Rosalinda Fazio - (DQ)*1-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for OC 3.5W WD have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.36 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.76
Catherine Fullerton
usually #2 Singles 63%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.62
Nancy Shih
published 4
3.57
Shelly Hilliard
published
3.53
Rosalinda Fazio
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 20% · published 4
3.48
Lacey Seward
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.45
Lauren Prelesnik
published
3.42
Josephine Garrett
published
3.35
Tiffany Pena
published
3.33
Jacqueline Jernigan
published 3.5
3.19
Samantha Bloom
published
3.18
Lisa Wellman
published
3.09
Debra Horns
published 3.5
2.73
Michelle Schmit
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lacey Seward + Catherine Fullerton10855% games+9.6% vs expected
Rosalinda Fazio + Lauren Prelesnik2542% games−1.0% vs expected
Rosalinda Fazio + Nancy Shih314 matchesnot enough data
Rosalinda Fazio + Lacey Seward123 matchesnot enough data
Lacey Seward + Nancy Shih213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Catherine Fullerton
92W–51L career · 8 lines in 2022
2%94%3%
3.76
4
Nancy Shih
67W–52L career · no lines in 2022
18%82%<1%
3.62
Shelly Hilliard
8W–6L career · no lines in 2022
29%71%<1%
3.57
4
Rosalinda Fazio
96W–130L career · 10 lines in 2022
41%59%<1%
3.53
3.5
Lacey Seward
95W–62L career · 6 lines in 2022
<1%56%44%
3.48
Lauren Prelesnik
11W–12L career · no lines in 2022
65%35%<1%
3.45
Josephine Garrett
7W–19L career · no lines in 2022
73%27%<1%
3.42
Tiffany Pena
2W–5L career · no lines in 2022
<1%88%12%
3.35
3.5
Jacqueline Jernigan
7W–19L career · no lines in 2022
1%90%9%
3.33
Samantha Bloom
3W–6L career · no lines in 2022
7%92%1%
3.19
Lisa Wellman
4W–6L career · no lines in 2022
8%91%1%
3.18
3.5
Debra Horns
40W–72L career · no lines in 2022
25%75%<1%
3.09
Michelle Schmit
5W–13L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
2.73

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.