Teams

Lob Lovers

2024 FALL DAYTIME DOUBLES - BOISE · TV

11 players · average NTRP 2.67 / IDAHO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-10-08vs Volley VixensLost 01
L#2 DoublesMartine Castoro / Debra Purdy vs Mandie Garity / Nancy Gordon0-6, 2-6
2024-10-03vs Drop shot DivasLost 02
L#1 DoublesRuth Adler / Elizabeth Schneider vs Saundra Coronado / Michelle Goodson1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesMartine Castoro / Debra Purdy vs Sara Brown / Ahnna Dudley3-6, 2-6
2024-10-01vs Babys Got BackhandLost 01
L#2 DoublesElizabeth Schneider / Julie Simon vs Kristina Winterling / Breanna Taylor0-6, 1-6
2024-09-24vs Drop shot DivasLost 03
L#1 DoublesElizabeth Schneider / Ruth Adler vs Katie Walther / Elizabeth Engroff6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesNatalie Carlise / Debra Purdy vs Pamela Brady / Jennifer Jensen3-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesNancy Napier / Julie Simon vs Ahnna Dudley / Sara Brown2-6, 2-6
2024-09-19vs Babys Got BackhandLost 02
L#2 DoublesElizabeth Schneider / Nancy Napier vs Amy Pugsley / Danielle Krawl0-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesAngela Little / Natalie Carlise vs Breanna Taylor / Kristina Winterling1-6, 1-6
2024-09-17vs Volley VixensSplit 11
L#1 DoublesNatalie Carlise / Debra Purdy vs Susie Christie / Kathy Deahl2-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesNancy Napier / Ruth Adler vs Nancy Gordon / Beverly Chaney6-2, 6-2
2024-09-12vs Drop shot DivasLost 01
L#2 DoublesElizabeth Schneider / Angela Little vs Kim McReynolds / Saundra Coronado6-4, 3-6, 0-1
2024-09-10vs Babys Got BackhandLost 02
L#2 DoublesNatalie Carlise / Coree Carver vs Jodi Whittaker / Amy Getz0-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesElizabeth Schneider / Julie Simon vs Hannah Young / Danielle Krawl4-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · TV
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Babys Got Backhand8119818183
2Drop shot Divas7220718183
3Lob Lovers0932448295

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.50 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.06
Ruth Adler
published 3
2.84
Coree Carver
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.66
Addie Harris
published 3
2.61
Angela Little
published 2.5
2.50
Elizabeth Schneider
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
2.39
Diana Linderman
published 2.5
2.15
Julie Simon
published 2.5
2.15
Debra Purdy
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 2.5
2.12
Martine Castoro
published 2.5
Nancy Napier
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Natalie Carlise
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Diana Linderman + Ruth Adler3544% games+12.4% vs expected
Diana Linderman + Elizabeth Schneider6554% gamesnot enough data
Ruth Adler + Elizabeth Schneider2641% gamesnot enough data
Elizabeth Schneider + Julie Simon0825% gamesnot enough data
Ruth Adler + Martine Castoro2541% gamesnot enough data
Debra Purdy + Martine Castoro0623% gamesnot enough data
Martine Castoro + Elizabeth Schneider2434% gamesnot enough data
Elizabeth Schneider + Angela Little0638% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Ruth Adler
70W–48L career · no lines in 2024
<1%33%67%
3.06
3
Coree Carver
42W–21L career · 1 line in 2024
<1%89%11%
2.84
3
Addie Harris
6W–23L career · no lines in 2024
12%88%<1%
2.66
2.5
Angela Little
21W–20L career · no lines in 2024
0%21%79%
2.61
2.5
Elizabeth Schneider
24W–34L career · 6 lines in 2024
0%50%50%
2.50
2.5
Diana Linderman
38W–50L career · no lines in 2024
0%79%21%
2.39
2.5
Julie Simon
4W–15L career · no lines in 2024
0%>99%<1%
2.15
2.5
Debra Purdy
4W–18L career · 4 lines in 2024
0%>99%<1%
2.15
2.5
Martine Castoro
15W–54L career · no lines in 2024
0%>99%<1%
2.12
Nancy Napier
3W–9L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
Natalie Carlise
10W–23L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.