← Search

Natalie Carlise

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Boise, ID
2.5C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
37 matches · 11W–26L · seasons 2021–2024
Match history37 matches
L
2024-09-24 · Lob Lovers · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Debra Purdy
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 1-6
L
2024-09-19 · Lob Lovers · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Angela Little
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 1-6
L
2024-09-17 · Lob Lovers · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Debra Purdy
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 0-6
L
2024-09-10 · Lob Lovers · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Coree Carver
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
0-6, 0-6
L
2024-07-09 · Racquet Rebels · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Stacey Novak
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
0-6, 2-6
L
2024-06-27 · Racquet Rebels · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Nancy Napier
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
0-6, 3-6
L
2024-06-25 · Racquet Rebels · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Elizabeth Schneider
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
0-6, 0-6
W
2024-06-11 · Racquet Rebels · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Stacey Novak
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-1, 6-2
L
2024-06-04 · Racquet Rebels · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Stacey Novak
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 1-6
L
2023-06-27 · Uncorked Again! · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Stacey Kozakar
loading the estimate
6-2, 4-6, 0-1
W
2023-06-22 · Uncorked Again! · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Stacey Novak
loading the estimate
1-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2023-06-04 · Uncorked Again! · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Stacey Novak
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-0, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams10 teams · 2021–2024
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
2.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.0
33.3%
5W–10L · 45.4% of games
6.0
23.8%
5W–16L · 35.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 62% of the time
#3 Doubles
62%
23 matches
#2 Doubles
27%
10 matches
#1 Doubles
11%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Start where you are. Use what you have. Do what you can.
Arthur Ashe