← Search

Deborah Phelps

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Star, ID
3.0C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
67 matches · 28W–39L · seasons 2018–2024
Match history67 matches
L
2024-08-28 · Aces & Laces · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Kit Herndon
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 2-6
L
2024-08-05 · Aces & Laces · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Suzanne Thomas
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-0, 4-6, 0-1
L
2024-08-03 · ACES & LACES · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Elisa Schutz championship
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 7-6, 0-1
W
N/A
2024-06-27 · ACES & LACES · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Kathy Tassano
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
W
2024-06-06 · ACES & LACES · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Elisa Schutz
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-1, 7-5
W
2024-06-04 · ACES & LACES · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Ellen German
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 7-5
L
2023-06-30 · Aces & Laces · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Sue Large
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 6-0, 0-1
W
2023-06-27 · Aces & Laces · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Jody Metcalf
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2023-06-22 · Aces & Laces · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Jody Metcalf
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 6-7
W
2023-06-13 · Aces & Laces · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Sandy Vaughan
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 6-3
L
2022-07-07 · ACES & LACES · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Vicki Ludders
loading the estimate
3-6, 2-6
L
2022-06-21 · ACES & LACES · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Sue Large
loading the estimate
0-6, 1-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams16 teams · 2019–2025
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
2.5
36.4%
4W–7L · 44.4% of games
3.0
36%
9W–16L · 42.1% of games
6.0
45%
9W–11L · 51.8% of games
5.5mixed
57.1%
4W–3L · 55.2% of games
6.0mixed
50%
2W–2L · 47.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 40% of the time
#3 Doubles
40%
27 matches
#2 Doubles
25%
17 matches
#1 Doubles
19%
13 matches
#1 Singles
13%
9 matches
#2 Singles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams