Teams

CSU GOLD

2026 ITA MIXED - DEN · MIXED 9.5 - ITA

15 players · average NTRP 4.62 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-08-22vs CP GREENLost 12
L#1 DoublesKelsey Schmidt / Sam Grote vs Michelle Sulahian / Roman Khmelev5-7, 7-5, 0-1
W#2 DoublesLucas Martin / Emily Sieg vs Eric Hubbard / Stephanie Skarwecki3-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#3 DoublesMadison Hoffman / Jake Milliken vs Ashleigh Chiaf / Matthew Hooper5-7, 7-6, 1-0
2026-08-09vs MLF BLUELost 12
L#1 DoublesJake Milliken / Emily Sieg vs Thomas Carson / Alba Galindo3-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesSophie Hartman / Taylor Jean vs Kim van Ginkel / Zachary Bekkedahl4-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesSam Grote / Mattison Sperry vs Michael Boyle / Adriana Jones6-4, 4-6, 0-1
2026-08-02vs BP GREENWon 21
W#1 DoublesMadison Hoffman / Lucas Martin vs Katharine Kirby / Daniel Lizarribar7-5, 6-1
W#2 DoublesEmily Sieg / Taylor Jean vs Paul Park / Tanya Cumalat6-3, 6-3
L#3 DoublesSam Grote / Karolina Ottem vs AJ Johnson / Anastassiya Zherdeva1-6, 4-6
2026-08-01vs CP GREENLost 03
L#1 DoublesJake Milliken / Sophie Hartman vs Benjamin Schlichting / Hailey Suyumov3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesAdeline Robinson / Sam Grote vs Kristen Sutton / Eric Hubbard6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesElin Farnell / Shawn Farnell vs Ashleigh Chiaf / Matthew Hooper3-6, 2-6
2026-07-19vs MLF BLUELost 12
L#1 DoublesJake Milliken / Kelsey Schmidt vs Susanna Styve / Martin Krbec2-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesSophie Hartman / Taylor Jean vs Adriana Jones / Zachary Bekkedahl4-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesSam Grote / Adeline Robinson vs Andrea Wallace / Marc Weiner6-2, 6-3
2026-07-12vs BP GREENWon 21
W#1 DoublesTaylor Jean / Sophie Hartman vs Kristen Kirby / Peter Fitzgerald3-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesLucas Martin / Suzanne Hale vs Daniel Lizarribar / Emily Pedersen2-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesKelsey Schmidt / Sam Grote vs Alex Le / Doris Aleksovska7-5, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MIXED 9.5 - ITA have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.43 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.86
Adeline Robinson
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 5
4.82
Kelsey Schmidt
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
4.76
Sophie Hartman
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 5
4.67
Mattison Sperry
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
4.64
Karolina Ottem
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
4.64
Lucas Martin
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
4.52
Elin Farnell
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 5
4.44
Madison Hoffman
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
4.36
Taylor Jean
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
4.33
Jake Milliken
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
4.33
Shawn Farnell
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.25
Sam Grote
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published
4.21
Suzanne Hale
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.96
Emily Sieg
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.72
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Elin Farnell + Shawn Farnell5454% gamesnot enough data
Emily Sieg + Jake Milliken224 matchesnot enough data
Taylor Jean + Sophie Hartman213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Adeline Robinson
2W–7L career · 2 lines in 2026
no projection at this level
4.86
Kelsey Schmidt
9W–9L career · 3 lines in 2026
no projection at this level
4.82
5
Sophie Hartman
2W–2L career · type T · 4 lines in 2026
no projection at this level
4.76
Mattison Sperry
0W–3L career · 1 line in 2026
no projection at this level
4.67
Karolina Ottem
4W–3L career · 1 line in 2026
no projection at this level
4.64
Lucas Martin
13W–2L career · 3 lines in 2026
no projection at this level
4.64
5
Elin Farnell
49W–30L career · 1 line in 2026
no projection at this level
4.52
Madison Hoffman
31W–11L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%66%34%
4.44
4.5
Taylor Jean
44W–14L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%84%16%
4.36
4.5
Jake Milliken
42W–42L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%88%11%
4.33
4.5
Shawn Farnell
58W–59L career · 1 line in 2026
1%88%11%
4.33
Sam Grote
8W–6L career · 6 lines in 2026
4%93%3%
4.25
4.5
Suzanne Hale
133W–73L career · 1 line in 2026
7%91%2%
4.21
Emily Sieg
20W–13L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%<1%>99%
3.96
4
Hanna Grow-Morales
52W–33L career · no lines in 2026
6%92%2%
3.72

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.