← Search

Hanna Grow-Morales

Fort Collins, CO
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
140 matches · 85W–55L · seasons 2020–2026

Captains: add Hanna Grow-Morales to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history140 matches
W
2026-08-02 · CSU GREEN · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Ian Duque mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-07-22 · CSU GREEN · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Burke Reilly mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-4
L
Brennan Price / Loc Nguyen
2026-07-11 · #3 Doubles · with Jeran Krause championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
L
Zel Mertz / Mike Kirby
2026-07-10 · #3 Doubles · with Jeran Krause championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 2-6
L
2026-07-10 · #1 Doubles · with Daniel Veloso Aguila championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-13 · #2 Doubles · with Christine Pelletier championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
L
2026-06-07 · #2 Doubles · with Tyler Hempstead championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
2026-06-06 · #2 Doubles · with Tyler Hempstead championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-7, 1-0
W
Michael Huynh / Joy Herrin
2026-06-05 · #1 Doubles · with Tyler Hempstead championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-05-26 · CSU GOLD · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Meredith McClellan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
L
2026-05-19 · CSU GOLD · #2 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
W
2026-05-17 · CSU GREEN · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Jacob Escobedo mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams41 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
3.0
60%
3W–2L · 56.5% of games
4.0
57.4%
27W–20L · 54% of games
4.5
33.3%
2W–4L · 37.1% of games
7.5mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
73.3%
11W–4L · 56.5% of games
8.5mixed
75%
12W–4L · 61.1% of games
9.0mixed
81%
17W–4L · 58.2% of games
9.5mixed
55.6%
5W–4L · 54.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 41% of the time
#1 Doubles
41%
58 matches
#2 Doubles
31%
43 matches
#3 Doubles
21%
29 matches
#1 Singles
6%
9 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams