Teams

NJ YELLOW

2023 CTA WOMEN'S 2.5 - DEN · WOMEN 2.5 - DEN

4 players · average NTRP 2.67 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-07-19vs BCC GREENLost 02
L#1 DoublesElizabeth LaBelle / Hope Yasbin Engel vs Amy Gilbride / Jori Whitling1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesKat Holm / Danielle MacHiorletti vs Emma Anselmi / Lisabeth Warshafsky3-6, 6-3, 0-1
2023-07-12vs BRMST NAVYSplit 11
W#1 SinglesJoni Roberts vs N/A6-0, 6-0
L#2 DoublesNedra Cox / Kat Holm vs Kelly O'Brien / Lisa Francisco6-2, 0-6, 0-1
2023-07-05vs MEA GREENWon 10
W#2 DoublesHope Yasbin Engel / Kat Holm vs Brendan Ash / Kim Congedo6-4, 2-6, 1-0
2023-06-28vs TTA-E REDWon 10
W#2 DoublesElizabeth LaBelle / Kat Holm vs Jennifer Nash / Amanda Blake6-2, 6-4
2023-06-27Won 10
W#2 DoublesNedra Cox / Joni Roberts vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2023-06-21vs RCC BLUESplit 11
L#1 DoublesJoni Roberts / Erin Jackman vs Chrissy Hasek / Alana MacY0-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesKat Holm / Hope Yasbin Engel vs Naomi Gaeng / Madison Walz6-3, 6-4
2023-06-07vs RMTC REDWon 10
W#2 DoublesJoni Roberts / Natalie Richardson vs Melanie Banders / Amy Franke7-5, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 2.5 - DEN have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.30 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.62
Hope Yasbin Engel
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.20
Joni Roberts
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 2.5
2.08
Kat Holm
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Elizabeth LaBelle
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Hope Yasbin Engel + Elizabeth LaBelle21236% games−4.9% vs expected
Hope Yasbin Engel + Joni Roberts2342% gamesnot enough data
Hope Yasbin Engel + Kat Holm213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Hope Yasbin Engel
29W–42L career · 3 lines in 2023
20%80%<1%
2.62
2.5
Joni Roberts
19W–48L career · 4 lines in 2023
0%98%2%
2.20
2.5
Kat Holm
19W–47L career · 5 lines in 2023
0%>99%<1%
2.08
Elizabeth LaBelle
6W–17L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.