Teams

MEA GREEN

2023 CTA WOMEN'S 2.5 - DEN · WOMEN 2.5 - DEN

6 players · average NTRP 3.00 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-07-19vs CVTA REDWon 10
W#2 DoublesLauren Noyes / Brendan Ash vs Kristen Keller / Kim Huss6-2, 6-2
2023-07-12vs BCC GREENWon 10
W#1 SinglesMelissa Azer vs Lisabeth Warshafsky7-5, 6-4
2023-07-05vs NJ YELLOWLost 01
L#2 DoublesBrendan Ash / Kim Congedo vs Hope Yasbin Engel / Kat Holm4-6, 6-2, 0-1
2023-06-28vs RCC BLUEWon 10
W#1 SinglesMelissa Azer vs Amanda Sarti6-0, 6-0
2023-06-21vs RMTC REDWon 10
W#2 DoublesBrendan Ash / Claudia Roppel vs Melissa Rosenberg / Amy Franke6-1, 4-6, 1-0
2023-06-14Lost 01
L#1 DoublesBrendan Ash / Susan Wu vs Cynthia Stadd Orvis / Kelly O'Brien2-6, 4-6
2023-06-07vs TTA-E REDWon 20
W#1 DoublesLauren Noyes / Melissa Azer vs SONJA STANLEY / Heather Gardner4-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#2 DoublesBrendan Ash / Claudia Roppel vs Kelly Weinland / Amanda Blake7-5, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 2.5 - DEN have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.72 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.83
Lauren Noyes
published
2.81
Mandy Sladden
published
2.77
Shannon Ross
published
Claudia Roppel
published 3
2.63
Melissa Azer
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.58
Brendan Ash
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lauren Noyes + Mandy Sladden3447% games−6.3% vs expected
Brendan Ash + Shannon Ross2341% gamesnot enough data
Shannon Ross + Melissa Azer314 matchesnot enough data
Shannon Ross + Mandy Sladden314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lauren Noyes
13W–9L career · no lines in 2023
1%87%12%
2.83
Mandy Sladden
23W–8L career · no lines in 2023
1%90%8%
2.81
Shannon Ross
19W–16L career · no lines in 2023
3%92%5%
2.77
3
Claudia Roppel
1W–1L career · type A · no lines in 2023
not enough data
3
Melissa Azer
25W–17L career · 3 lines in 2023
17%83%<1%
2.63
3
Brendan Ash
33W–54L career · type A · 5 lines in 2023
29%71%<1%
2.58

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.