Teams

BC-MCC/EricSmith

2023 SOCAL DOUBLES - Beach Cities · BC Men - 4.5

10 players · average NTRP 4.50 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-11-11vs BC-WestEnd/RogerKodaniWon 20
W#1 DoublesEric Smith / Andrew Radden vs David Newton / Adam Geiger6-3, 6-0
W#3 DoublesRoss Wooldridge / Remco Waller vs Roger Kodani / Jeffrey Earl6-4, 6-0
2023-10-28vs BC-BJKTC/KazKataokaLost 02
L#1 DoublesAndrew Radden / Edward Han vs Andrew Johnson / Daniel Keolasy1-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesEric Knudson / Remco Waller vs Anand Jethva / Edward Charles4-6, 2-6
2023-10-21vs BC-LLW-WestEnd/KeithOshiroLost 01
L#3 DoublesJason Manasse / Andrew Radden vs Dominic Juneau / Daniel Hying3-6, 6-7
2023-10-14vs BC-Lakewood/TonyHsuWon 10
W#1 DoublesWestley White / Andrew Radden vs York Cheng / Nicholas de Goede7-5, 7-5
2023-10-07vs BC-PVTC/PeterMalishkaLost 01
L#2 DoublesScott Brown / Andrew Radden vs Joshua Chou / Joseph Chou0-6, 3-6
2023-09-23vs BC-Kramer/JoePiccirilloLost 01
L#3 DoublesKevin Keenan / Remco Waller vs Jason Frame / Mark Landon7-6, 1-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for BC Men - 4.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.17 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.63
Tim Crawmer
published 4.5
4.36
Simon Peters
published
4.28
Andrew Radden
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4.5
Abe Wong
published 4.5
4.24
Jason Manasse
published
4.16
Ross Wooldridge
published
4.15
Henry Coia
published
3.98
Steven Anderson
published
3.56
Matt Witherell
published
Remco Waller
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Andrew Radden + Jason Manasse3343% games−7.8% vs expected
Ross Wooldridge + Simon Peters213 matchesnot enough data
Henry Coia + Steven Anderson213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Tim Crawmer
26W–12L career · no lines in 2023
<1%19%81%
4.63
Simon Peters
4W–4L career · no lines in 2023
1%84%16%
4.36
4.5
Andrew Radden
67W–56L career · 5 lines in 2023
2%92%5%
4.28
4.5
Abe Wong
1W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Jason Manasse
5W–2L career · no lines in 2023
4%93%3%
4.24
Ross Wooldridge
4W–5L career · no lines in 2023
13%86%1%
4.16
Henry Coia
10W–5L career · no lines in 2023
14%86%1%
4.15
Steven Anderson
12W–6L career · no lines in 2023
55%45%<1%
3.98
Matt Witherell
4W–3L career · no lines in 2023
32%68%<1%
3.56
Remco Waller
35W–36L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.