Teams

CV-Indian Wells TG/S Nickerson & Kilburn

2023 USTA Adult 55 & Over - CV · CV Women 6.0

7 players · average NTRP 3.50 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-03-28Won 10
W#2 DoublesCamille Elliott / Sherri Nickerson vs Zava Rosen / Edith Gross3-6, 6-0, 1-0
2023-02-22vs LLW-CV-Rancho La Quinta/YoungSplit 11
L#2 DoublesJulee Moore / Patty Booth vs Suzanne Young / Nancy Anderson0-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesCamille Elliott / Lori Kilburn vs Betsy Michel / Jill Day6-1, 6-7, 1-0
2023-02-15vs CV-Mission Hills/LoberSplit 11
W#1 DoublesCamille Elliott / Nicole Popper vs Obsidiana Abril-Horpel / Ann Robinow6-4, 6-3
L#2 DoublesSherri Nickerson / Julee Moore vs Nancy Pacharzina / Jane Cunningham6-4, 1-6, 0-1
2023-02-08vs CV-Sun City Shadow Hills/P PruntyWon 10
W#2 DoublesCamille Elliott / Carmen Nokes vs Terri Johnson / Margaret Clancy2-6, 6-3, 1-0
2023-01-25vs CV-Rancho La Quinta/L WalkerWon 10
W#2 DoublesJulee Moore / Sherri Nickerson vs Laura Walker / Annie Ottesen6-2, 7-5
2023-01-18vs LLW-CV-Rancho La Quinta/YoungLost 01
L#3 DoublesCarol Shaw / Julee Moore vs Katherine Binder / Stacie Hogan2-6, 3-6
2023-01-11vs CV-Mission Hills/LoberWon 10
W#3 DoublesJulee Moore / Shari Landa vs Laurie Lober / Julie George6-1, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for CV Women 6.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.06 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.10
Camille Elliott
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.04
Julee Moore
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
3.04
Lori Kilburn
published
Eileen Martin
published
Nicole Popper
published
Patty Booth
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Sherri Nickerson
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Julee Moore + Camille Elliott5454% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Camille Elliott
62W–64L career · 4 lines in 2023
23%77%<1%
3.10
Julee Moore
44W–67L career · 10 lines in 2023
<1%37%63%
3.04
Lori Kilburn
1W–6L career · no lines in 2023
>99%<1%<1%
3.04
Eileen Martin
6W–13L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Nicole Popper
2W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Patty Booth
17W–30L career · 1 line in 2023
not enough data
Sherri Nickerson
5W–5L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.