Teams

8.0 WIN ClarkLehan W55S

2024 SPRING Adult 55 & Over - CAZ · 8.0 Adult 55 & Over Women

15 players · average NTRP 4.00 / CENTRAL ARIZONA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule12 played
2024-04-27vs 8.0 GK Schneider W55SSplit 11
L#1 DoublesCatherine van Ross / Jo Lehan vs Valerie Schneider / Amy Rhoden4-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesKelley Quinn / Susan Hanson vs Camilla Harrison / Sheila Wood4-6, 6-4, 1-0
2024-04-20vs 8.0 GK Schneider W55SWon 30
W#1 DoublesVeronica Fuller / Catherine van Ross vs Lynne Dugan / Valerie Schneider6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesSusan Hanson / Jo Lehan vs Chris Linderson / Amy Rhoden7-6, 6-4
W#3 DoublesJulie Walker / Eileen Urbanowski vs Ann Harwood / Camilla Harrison3-6, 6-1, 1-0
2024-04-13vs PHX/FonsecaCrannell/55&O/8.0WWon 21
L#1 DoublesEileen Urbanowski / Julie Walker vs Debbie Lacey / Kelly Sparks2-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesJo Lehan / Catherine van Ross vs Donna Nelson / Cindy Fonseca5-7, 7-5, 1-0
W#3 DoublesStephanie Clark / Shirine Faris vs Jane Gordon / Susanne Hogan6-3, 4-6, 1-0
2024-04-06vs 8.0 TRIL Olson W55SLost 03
L#1 DoublesStephanie Clark / Veronica Fuller vs Kathy Dutridge / Christina Harrison3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesKelley Quinn / Jane Berkley vs Lori Ellingson / Cynthia Shaw2-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesJo Lehan / Catherine van Ross vs Lynette Larsen / Holly Wohler3-6, 2-6
2024-03-30vs 8.0 VDCR Harris W55SLost 03
L#1 DoublesCatherine van Ross / Stephanie Clark vs Becky Flander / Judy Doseck6-7, 3-6
L#2 DoublesVeronica Fuller / Lili Cascino vs Katie Campbell / Kim Warren4-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesJulie Walker / Eileen Urbanowski vs Mary Jo Nurney / Marie Welsh4-6, 3-6
2024-03-23vs 8.0 PTC Ferrari Acers W55SLost 03
L#1 DoublesJo Lehan / Jane Berkley vs Cindy Brannon / Jane Clarke2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesShirine Faris / Lauren Guilmart vs Katherine Baker / Julie Palmer4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#3 DoublesCatherine van Ross / Stephanie Clark vs Doreen O'Kelly / Linda Frazee6-1, 0-6, 1-0
2024-03-16vs 8.0 PTC Kinney W55SLost 02
L#1 DoublesKelley Quinn / Veronica Fuller vs Jill Nelson / Kyle Bohm6-7, 4-3
L#2 DoublesStephanie Clark / Lauren Guilmart vs Pam Rahhal / Louisa Wolowiecki3-6, 0-6
2024-03-09vs 8.0 CTC OBrienDeputy W55SLost 12
L#1 DoublesDanna Riordan / Jo Lehan vs Joy Bowles / Ann Deputy7-5, 1-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesStephanie Clark / Jody Neuman vs Cindy Guillaume / Cathy Coin6-3, 1-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesLynn Sanford / Jane Berkley vs Imee Arocan / Lisa Vargas4-6, 0-6
2024-02-24vs 8.0 ISP Williams W55SWon 21
W#1 DoublesVeronica Fuller / Jo Lehan vs Patricia White / Susan Dowling6-1, 7-5
L#2 DoublesStephanie Clark / Danna Riordan vs Glynnis Gillespie / Leanne Mariano4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#3 DoublesLynette Anderson / Jane Berkley vs Donna Ricco / Carolee Williams6-1, 7-6
2024-02-17vs 8.0 ISP Sets In The City W55SWon 30
W#1 DoublesSusan Hanson / Catherine van Ross vs Mary Langenfeld / Nancy Villemez6-3, 6-4
W#2 DoublesDanna Riordan / Lynn Sanford vs Alisa DeMartino / Tonya Zettle5-7, 6-1, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJane Berkley / Veronica Fuller vs Julie Schmiedeler / AnnMarie Walsh6-3, 6-4
2024-02-09vs PHX/FonsecaCrannell/55&O/8.0WLost 12
W#1 DoublesJo Lehan / Catherine van Ross vs Sherri Finnegan / Kelly Sparks6-2, 2-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJane Berkley / Lili Cascino vs Alexis Robison / Donna Pace2-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesVeronica Fuller / Danna Riordan vs Xenia Spanos Carone / Susanne Hogan7-6, 4-6, 1-0
2024-01-27vs 8.0 TRIL Olson W55SLost 12
W#1 DoublesJo Lehan / Catherine van Ross vs Wendy Linnell / Susan Olson6-2, 6-3
L#2 DoublesJane Berkley / Lynn Sanford vs Sara Inzerillo / Holly Wohler0-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesStephanie Clark / Veronica Fuller vs Lynette Larsen / Deralyn Woodbury1-6, 6-2, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings10 teams · 8.0 Adult 55 & Over Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1PHX/FonsecaCrannell/55&O/8.0W102241229278
28.0 PTC Kinney W55S93261027249
38.0 TRIL Olson W55S93251128266
48.0 PTC Ferrari Acers W55S93251131299
58.0 CTC OBrienDeputy W55S66171947338
68.0 VDCR Harris W55S57152147361
78.0 WIN ClarkLehan W55S57152149358
88.0 GK Schneider W55S48162045360
98.0 ISP Sets In The City W55S21092758385
108.0 ISP Williams W55S11182860404

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.63 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.84
Shirine Faris
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.76
Jo Lehan
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 22% · published
Catherine van Ross
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 22% · published 4
3.69
Danna Riordan
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.45
Jody Neuman
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.41
Eileen Urbanowski
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Jane Berkley
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published
Kelley Quinn
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Lauren Guilmart
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Lili Cascino
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Lynette Anderson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Lynn Sanford
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Stephanie Clark
published
Susan Hanson
published
Veronica Fuller
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 38% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Catherine van Ross + Jo Lehan7453% gamesnot enough data
Stephanie Clark + Kelley Quinn6455% gamesnot enough data
Veronica Fuller + Stephanie Clark6364% gamesnot enough data
Danna Riordan + Veronica Fuller4355% gamesnot enough data
Danna Riordan + Lynn Sanford5158% gamesnot enough data
Shirine Faris + Veronica Fuller6062% gamesnot enough data
Catherine van Ross + Veronica Fuller314 matchesnot enough data
Danna Riordan + Jo Lehan044 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Shirine Faris
103W–32L career · 2 lines in 2024
1%86%13%
3.84
Jo Lehan
87W–64L career · 9 lines in 2024
3%92%4%
3.76
4
Catherine van Ross
41W–24L career · 9 lines in 2024
not enough data
4
Danna Riordan
24W–27L career · 4 lines in 2024
9%90%1%
3.69
4
Jody Neuman
51W–44L career · 1 line in 2024
65%35%<1%
3.45
Eileen Urbanowski
103W–105L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%74%26%
3.41
Jane Berkley
11W–16L career · 7 lines in 2024
not enough data
Kelley Quinn
56W–32L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
Lauren Guilmart
2W–7L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Lili Cascino
1W–5L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Lynette Anderson
13W–6L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
Lynn Sanford
41W–28L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
Stephanie Clark
36W–22L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Susan Hanson
33W–20L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Veronica Fuller
80W–34L career · 8 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.