Teams

Vibes & Volleys

2025 SoCal Doubles 18&Over -- WEEKDAY WOMEN · Ventura - Women 3.0 WD

12 players · average NTRP 2.50 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule1 played
2025-10-02vs Mission Oaks BlueLost 12
W#1 DoublesMelissa Mccoy / Meredith Romero vs Kelly Decker / Kimberly Meraz3-6, 6-0, 1-0
L#2 DoublesTamara Campbell / Ruifen Deng vs Joell Poppen / Peri Hauser6-2, 6-7, 0-1
L#3 DoublesElle Greg / Jennifer Yager vs Tory Cox / Jen Messecar3-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Ventura - Women 3.0 WD have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.61 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.97
Meredith Romero
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.94
Melissa Mccoy
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.73
Tamara Campbell
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.71
Susan Bender
published
2.71
Susan Owens
published
2.54
Megha Agarwal
published
2.52
Tes MacAraya
published
2.46
Heather Kelso
published 2.5
2.29
Elle Greg
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.25
Ilysia Pierce
published 2.5
Jennifer Yager
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Ruifen Deng
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Meredith Romero + Melissa Mccoy224 matchesnot enough data
Tamara Campbell + Elle Greg303 matchesnot enough data
Susan Owens + Heather Kelso123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Meredith Romero
7W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
58%42%<1%
2.97
Melissa Mccoy
5W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
67%33%<1%
2.94
Tamara Campbell
4W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
4%94%2%
2.73
Susan Bender
7W–19L career · no lines in 2025
5%93%1%
2.71
Susan Owens
2W–5L career · no lines in 2025
6%93%1%
2.71
Megha Agarwal
9W–9L career · no lines in 2025
38%62%<1%
2.54
Tes MacAraya
1W–4L career · no lines in 2025
45%55%<1%
2.52
2.5
Heather Kelso
6W–5L career · no lines in 2025
0%61%39%
2.46
2.5
Elle Greg
3W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
0%94%6%
2.29
2.5
Ilysia Pierce
1W–4L career · no lines in 2025
0%97%3%
2.25
Jennifer Yager
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Ruifen Deng
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.