Teams

Mission Oaks Blue

2025 SoCal Doubles 18&Over -- WEEKDAY WOMEN · Ventura - Women 3.0 WD

13 players · average NTRP 3.00 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule1 played
2025-10-02vs Vibes & VolleysWon 21
L#1 DoublesKelly Decker / Kimberly Meraz vs Melissa Mccoy / Meredith Romero6-3, 0-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesJoell Poppen / Peri Hauser vs Tamara Campbell / Ruifen Deng2-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesTory Cox / Jen Messecar vs Elle Greg / Jennifer Yager6-3, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Ventura - Women 3.0 WD have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.85 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.22
Carolina Britt
published 3
3.13
Nina Ahuja
published
2.98
Stacy Hall
published
2.98
Van Stephenson
published
2.93
Joell Poppen
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.88
2.86
Kelly Decker
published
2.78
2.72
Melissa Copeland
published
2.72
Jen Messecar
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.67
Kimberly Meraz
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.64
Peri Hauser
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.58
Tory Cox
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Carolina Britt + Kimberly Meraz3257% games+8.0% vs expected
Van Stephenson + Stacy Hall4167% gamesnot enough data
Tory Cox + Peri Hauser1433% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Carolina Britt
23W–6L career · no lines in 2025
<1%6%94%
3.22
Nina Ahuja
6W–6L career · no lines in 2025
<1%17%83%
3.13
Stacy Hall
7W–2L career · no lines in 2025
<1%54%46%
2.98
Van Stephenson
10W–8L career · no lines in 2025
<1%56%44%
2.98
Joell Poppen
8W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%68%32%
2.93
3
Christina Kniazewycz
5W–1L career · no lines in 2025
<1%81%19%
2.88
Kelly Decker
4W–1L career · no lines in 2025
<1%83%16%
2.86
Teresa Amescua-Smith
7W–5L career · no lines in 2025
2%92%6%
2.78
Melissa Copeland
2W–3L career · no lines in 2025
6%92%2%
2.72
Jen Messecar
5W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
6%92%2%
2.72
Kimberly Meraz
7W–13L career · 1 line in 2025
11%88%1%
2.67
Peri Hauser
3W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
15%84%1%
2.64
Tory Cox
4W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
27%73%<1%
2.58

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.