Teams

KTC Schuering

2025 OH OV SUMMER Combo · 6.5 Combo Women

15 players · average NTRP 3.50 / OHIO VALLEY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-08-17vs KTC GustafsonWon 30
W#1 DoublesStacie Remaly / Krystle Burris vs Lindsay Gustafson / Edel Jesse6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesTianna Ryan / Suzanne Sumner vs Kelly Carter / Amy Rohmiller7-5, 6-0
W#3 DoublesStephanie Fronista-Ward / Julie Matthews vs Sandra Smith / Michelle Lewis6-2, 6-2
2025-07-20vs STC CoffeySplit 11
W#1 DoublesCasey Bagley / Erin Armitage vs Annette Ross-Gray / Patricia Robinson6-2, 6-1
L#2 DoublesSuzanne Sumner / Krystle Burris vs Lori Keller / Nancy Eben3-6, 0-6
2025-07-13vs QRRC WeldeLost 03
L#1 DoublesCasey Bagley / Erin Armitage vs Alaina Casey / Gretchen Trubee3-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesStacie Remaly / Suzanne Sumner vs Rachel Tritz / Meredith Goel6-1, 4-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesKelsey Schuering / Montana Wait vs Jenah Bartek / Jessica Akemon0-6, 1-6
2025-06-08vs QRRC MortsolfLost 12
L#1 DoublesTianna Ryan / Casey Bagley vs Jessie Loeffelholz / Danielle Menningmann4-5
L#2 DoublesValen Zalants / Stacie Remaly vs Sarah Pierce / Amy Stimson6-7, 3-6
W#3 DoublesKelsey Schuering / Suzanne Sumner vs Stacey Mortsolf / Lisa Sauer7-6, 3-6, 1-0
2025-06-01vs SRTC MillerWon 30
W#1 DoublesCasey Bagley / Tianna Ryan vs Chetana Wilkins / Samanta Jraisat7-6, 6-1
W#2 DoublesKelsey Schuering / Emily Turner vs Laura Hovanec / Tillie Terzakis3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesKrystle Burris / Stephanie Fronista-Ward vs Melissa Doherty / Melinda Burton6-4, 4-6, 1-0
2025-05-18vs KTC ChamberlainWon 30
W#1 DoublesSarah Hedrick / Lyuda Fishman vs Linda Thomas / Kendra Roth6-7, 7-5, 1-0
W#2 DoublesStephanie Fronista-Ward / Tianna Ryan vs Deborah Whitcomb / Beth Andrews6-3, 6-1
W#3 DoublesErin Armitage / Valen Zalants vs Johnna Chamberlain / Sara Walk6-2, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.5 Combo Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.04 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.37
Casey Bagley
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.29
Stephanie Fronista-Ward
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.29
Stacie Remaly
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.20
Erin Armitage
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
3.19
Kelsey Schuering
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.19
Tianna Ryan
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.17
Jamie Compton
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.16
Lyuda Fishman
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.97
Suzanne Sumner
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.81
Sarah Hedrick
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.71
Krystle Burris
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.68
Lauren Erdmann
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.51
Montana Wait
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published
Julie Matthews
published
Valen Zalants
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Casey Bagley + Kelsey Schuering201850% games+6.9% vs expected
Stacie Remaly + Lyuda Fishman3448% games+4.2% vs expected
Sarah Hedrick + Suzanne Sumner5154% games+3.2% vs expected
Stacie Remaly + Stephanie Fronista-Ward5253% games−0.6% vs expected
Jamie Compton + Kelsey Schuering3844% games−0.8% vs expected
Stacie Remaly + Jamie Compton2348% gamesnot enough data
Sarah Hedrick + Casey Bagley2348% gamesnot enough data
Erin Armitage + Valen Zalants314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Casey Bagley
80W–59L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%82%18%
3.37
Stephanie Fronista-Ward
73W–70L career · 3 lines in 2025
2%91%7%
3.29
Stacie Remaly
103W–125L career · 3 lines in 2025
2%91%7%
3.29
Erin Armitage
60W–47L career · 5 lines in 2025
7%91%2%
3.20
Kelsey Schuering
78W–78L career · 6 lines in 2025
9%90%1%
3.19
Tianna Ryan
45W–8L career · 4 lines in 2025
9%90%1%
3.19
Jamie Compton
79W–94L career · 1 line in 2025
11%88%1%
3.17
Lyuda Fishman
102W–125L career · 3 lines in 2025
12%87%1%
3.16
Suzanne Sumner
77W–73L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%58%42%
2.97
Sarah Hedrick
41W–46L career · 1 line in 2025
1%90%8%
2.81
Krystle Burris
19W–14L career · 3 lines in 2025
6%92%2%
2.71
Lauren Erdmann
20W–13L career · 4 lines in 2025
10%89%1%
2.68
Montana Wait
36W–51L career · 6 lines in 2025
0%47%53%
2.51
Julie Matthews
19W–28L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Valen Zalants
13W–12L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.