Teams

SRTC Miller

2025 OH OV SUMMER Combo · 6.5 Combo Women

14 players · average NTRP 3.33 / OHIO VALLEY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-06-22vs STC CoffeyLost 12
L#1 DoublesTricia Fahrenholz / Amanda Elias vs Kristine McMaken / Nancy Eben7-6, 5-7, 0-1
L#2 DoublesKaren Hoffman / Samanta Jraisat vs Jacqueline Coffey / Jennifer Arnett7-5, 4-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesLaura Hovanec / Katie Humphreville vs Donna Stafford / Patricia Robinson6-2, 6-2
2025-06-01vs KTC SchueringLost 03
L#1 DoublesChetana Wilkins / Samanta Jraisat vs Casey Bagley / Tianna Ryan6-7, 1-6
L#2 DoublesLaura Hovanec / Tillie Terzakis vs Kelsey Schuering / Emily Turner6-3, 3-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesMelissa Doherty / Melinda Burton vs Krystle Burris / Stephanie Fronista-Ward4-6, 6-4, 0-1
2025-05-18vs QRRC WeldeLost 12
W#1 DoublesMary Miller / Lindsay Bremar vs Noreen Beiersdorfer / Gretchen Trubee4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesLaura Hovanec / Arshia Myers vs Georgianne Lowman / Sam Linhardt3-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesLynn Watkins / Karen Hoffman vs TOMOKO WELDE / Meredith Goel2-6, 7-5, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.5 Combo Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.98 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.46
Lindsay Bremar
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.29
Amanda Elias
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.15
Laura Hovanec
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.12
Chetana Wilkins
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.07
Karen Hoffman
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.02
Tillie Terzakis
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.01
Rebecca Cobb
published
3.00
Katie Humphreville
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.99
Melinda Burton
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.98
Samanta Jraisat
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.98
Arshia Myers
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.86
Tricia Fahrenholz
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.78
Lynn Watkins
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.02
Melissa Doherty
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Katie Humphreville + Melinda Burton6172% games+29.7% vs expected
Lynn Watkins + Katie Humphreville10169% games+13.3% vs expected
Tricia Fahrenholz + Katie Humphreville7357% games+8.4% vs expected
Chetana Wilkins + Lindsay Bremar12755% games+7.0% vs expected
Arshia Myers + Katie Humphreville4452% games+5.1% vs expected
Lynn Watkins + Melinda Burton2450% games+3.3% vs expected
Lynn Watkins + Karen Hoffman6455% games+3.3% vs expected
Amanda Elias + Karen Hoffman6650% games+1.2% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lindsay Bremar
129W–134L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%62%38%
3.46
3.5
Amanda Elias
42W–29L career · 1 line in 2025
2%91%7%
3.29
Laura Hovanec
63W–100L career · 3 lines in 2025
13%86%1%
3.15
3.5
Chetana Wilkins
69W–77L career · 1 line in 2025
19%80%<1%
3.12
Karen Hoffman
60W–76L career · 2 lines in 2025
32%68%<1%
3.07
Tillie Terzakis
60W–53L career · 1 line in 2025
43%57%<1%
3.02
Rebecca Cobb
70W–41L career · no lines in 2025
<1%46%54%
3.01
Katie Humphreville
61W–29L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%51%49%
3.00
Melinda Burton
66W–57L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%52%48%
2.99
Samanta Jraisat
32W–31L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%55%45%
2.98
3
Arshia Myers
44W–42L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%56%44%
2.98
Tricia Fahrenholz
78W–52L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%84%15%
2.86
Lynn Watkins
72W–50L career · 1 line in 2025
2%92%5%
2.78
Melissa Doherty
6W–11L career · 4 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.02

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.