Teams

DIAMOND HILLS 55AW8.0A

2023 ADULT 55&Over · Women 8.0

12 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
W#2 DoublesTracie Cacciatore / Priscilla Macksoud vs Karen Gee / Carmen Duarte0-6, 6-4, 1-0
2023-05-15vs ST MARY 55AW8.0ALost 01
L#1 DoublesTracie Cacciatore / Nora Hayward vs Jennifer Leebove / Nicole Radlow6-3, 3-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesPriscilla Macksoud / Tracie Cacciatore vs Ning Docena / Gail Pearson6-7, 2-6
L#2 DoublesTracie Cacciatore / Jane Liles vs Michelle McDermott / Miwon Vella7-5, 1-6, 0-1
L#1 DoublesRuth Broach / Tracie Cacciatore vs Marcy Sharafian / Kay Johnson1-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 8.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.18 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.47
Olga Candelario
published
3.43
Tracie Cacciatore
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published
3.20
Tina Lugo
published
3.18
Grace Overton
published 3.5
3.17
Catherine Kutsuris
published 3.5
3.10
Jane Liles
published
3.09
Kimberly Autajay
published
3.04
Priscilla Macksoud
published
2.89
Christina Dalton
published 3.5
Nora Hayward
published
Ruth Broach
published
Shirley Razdoroff
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jane Liles + Christina Dalton044 matchesnot enough data
Nora Hayward + Grace Overton044 matchesnot enough data
Christina Dalton + Shirley Razdoroff123 matchesnot enough data
Catherine Kutsuris + Kimberly Autajay123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Olga Candelario
3W–5L career · no lines in 2023
<1%59%41%
3.47
Tracie Cacciatore
67W–83L career · 7 lines in 2023
70%30%<1%
3.43
Tina Lugo
10W–18L career · no lines in 2023
6%93%1%
3.20
3.5
Grace Overton
3W–9L career · no lines in 2023
8%91%1%
3.18
3.5
Catherine Kutsuris
1W–2L career · no lines in 2023
9%90%1%
3.17
Jane Liles
5W–22L career · no lines in 2023
22%78%<1%
3.10
Kimberly Autajay
3W–13L career · no lines in 2023
23%76%<1%
3.09
Priscilla Macksoud
2W–7L career · no lines in 2023
38%62%<1%
3.04
3.5
Christina Dalton
4W–16L career · no lines in 2023
80%20%<1%
2.89
Nora Hayward
0W–6L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Ruth Broach
0W–15L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Shirley Razdoroff
3W–7L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.