Teams

WALNUT CREEK RC/Walnut Creek TC 55AW8.0A

2023 ADULT 55&Over · Women 8.0

19 players · average NTRP 3.88 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Women 8.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.63 estimated across 18 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.93
Marcy Sharafian
published
3.89
Euna Roh
published 4
3.89
Nancy Wilson
published
3.85
Nancy Doan
published
3.81
Kelly Saenz
published
3.79
Shari Mcaneney
published
3.76
Judy Cummins
published
3.74
Lisa McGuinness
published
3.73
Sally Fitzhugh
published
3.66
Cecile Chenevey
published 4
3.65
Sally McKay
published
3.51
Tanya Lo
published
3.50
Ning Docena
published
3.38
Regina Hughes
published
3.37
Gail Pearson
published 4
3.33
Kay Johnson
published
3.33
Margaret Worden
published
3.17
Cynthia Attiyeh
published 3.5
Marian Zalewski
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lisa McGuinness + Sally McKay3550% games−9.1% vs expected
Ning Docena + Judy Cummins213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Marcy Sharafian
9W–17L career · no lines in 2023
70%30%<1%
3.93
4
Euna Roh
22W–14L career · no lines in 2023
<1%81%19%
3.89
Nancy Wilson
19W–27L career · no lines in 2023
81%19%<1%
3.89
Nancy Doan
19W–16L career · no lines in 2023
<1%88%12%
3.85
Kelly Saenz
3W–3L career · no lines in 2023
93%7%<1%
3.81
Shari Mcaneney
8W–12L career · no lines in 2023
1%93%5%
3.79
Judy Cummins
14W–11L career · no lines in 2023
2%94%3%
3.76
Lisa McGuinness
10W–9L career · no lines in 2023
3%94%2%
3.74
Sally Fitzhugh
10W–18L career · no lines in 2023
4%94%2%
3.73
4
Cecile Chenevey
17W–22L career · no lines in 2023
10%89%<1%
3.66
Sally McKay
5W–14L career · no lines in 2023
13%86%<1%
3.65
Tanya Lo
9W–22L career · no lines in 2023
47%53%<1%
3.51
Ning Docena
13W–26L career · no lines in 2023
51%49%<1%
3.50
Regina Hughes
36W–26L career · no lines in 2023
<1%81%19%
3.38
4
Gail Pearson
3W–6L career · no lines in 2023
84%16%<1%
3.37
Kay Johnson
16W–15L career · no lines in 2023
<1%89%10%
3.33
Margaret Worden
15W–23L career · no lines in 2023
1%90%10%
3.33
3.5
Cynthia Attiyeh
11W–21L career · type A · no lines in 2023
9%90%1%
3.17
Marian Zalewski
5W–12L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.