Teams

Lo.Hatlen55A

2024 Capital Adult 55 & Over · 4.0 Women

12 players · average NTRP 3.70 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2024-05-04vs Am.Clarke55ALost 02
L#2 DoublesDara Haney / Theresa Stone vs Tammy Sasser / Laura Hiller2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesSheila Riley / Lori Hatlen vs Amy Clarke / Carole Bobby7-5, 5-7, 0-1
2024-04-29vs St.Luther55AWon 30
W#1 DoublesDara Haney / Sandra Rhoades vs Michell Wilson / Dana Chapman7-6, 6-3
W#2 DoublesJudith Stewart / Zana Piric vs Stephanie Luther / Toni Paladino6-3, 6-0
W#3 DoublesSusan Paeplow / Joan Faulkner vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2024-04-20vs An.Hungate55AWon 30
W#1 DoublesErin McAllister / Zana Piric vs Kristen Stocking / Brenda Li4-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesSheila Riley / Lori Hatlen vs Anne Hungate / Adrienne Todd6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesJanet Sprague / Joan Faulkner vs Gillian Kelleher / Deb Lanier6-4, 4-6, 1-0
2024-04-13vs Am.Clarke55ALost 01
L#2 DoublesErin McAllister / Lori Hatlen vs Laura Hiller / Tammy Sasser1-6, 2-6
2024-04-06vs St.Luther55AWon 20
W#1 DoublesErin McAllister / Dara Haney vs Fran Ange / Sherrie Lefere6-0, 6-3
W#3 DoublesAnneliese Carr / Theresa Stone vs Alix Ballantyne / Pat Estes6-0, 6-2
2024-03-30vs An.Hungate55ALost 12
L#1 DoublesErin McAllister / Zana Piric vs Button Hall / Kathryn Stone1-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesLori Hatlen / Anneliese Carr vs Laura Davidson / Brenda Li6-3, 6-3
L#3 DoublesDara Haney / Joan Faulkner vs Anne Hungate / Kristen Stocking7-5, 3-6, 0-1
2024-03-25vs St.Luther55ALost 02
L#1 DoublesZana Piric / Susan Paeplow vs Fran Ange / Michell Wilson3-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJudith Stewart / Joan Faulkner vs Sherrie Lefere / Dana Chapman7-6, 6-7, 0-1
2024-03-16vs Am.Clarke55ALost 02
L#2 DoublesSheila Riley / Lori Hatlen vs Susan Fekete / Laura Weygandt1-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesJudith Stewart / Dara Haney vs Rosalind Manning / Jane Britt3-6, 1-6
2024-03-02vs An.Hungate55AWon 10
W#1 DoublesAnneliese Carr / Lori Hatlen vs Anne Hungate / Kathryn Stone1-6, 7-5, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.47 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.76
Erin McAllister
published
3.71
Janet Sprague
published
3.69
Lori Hatlen
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published 4
3.58
Susan Paeplow
published
3.57
Theresa Stone
published
3.49
Dara Haney
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.46
Anneliese Carr
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.36
Sheila Riley
published
3.33
Zana Piric
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.27
Joan Faulkner
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 30% · published 3.5
3.26
Sandra Rhoades
published
3.14
Judith Stewart
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Dara Haney + Lori Hatlen0537% gamesnot enough data
Dara Haney + Zana Piric224 matchesnot enough data
Sheila Riley + Erin McAllister123 matchesnot enough data
Lori Hatlen + Zana Piric123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Erin McAllister
26W–20L career · no lines in 2024
3%92%4%
3.76
Janet Sprague
10W–18L career · no lines in 2024
7%91%2%
3.71
4
Lori Hatlen
137W–170L career · type A · 6 lines in 2024
9%90%1%
3.69
Susan Paeplow
4W–9L career · no lines in 2024
28%72%<1%
3.58
Theresa Stone
8W–21L career · no lines in 2024
32%68%<1%
3.57
3.5
Dara Haney
188W–138L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%52%48%
3.49
4
Anneliese Carr
87W–100L career · 3 lines in 2024
62%38%<1%
3.46
Sheila Riley
8W–9L career · no lines in 2024
85%15%<1%
3.36
3.5
Zana Piric
135W–175L career · 4 lines in 2024
1%88%11%
3.33
3.5
Joan Faulkner
69W–72L career · 10 lines in 2024
3%92%5%
3.27
Sandra Rhoades
14W–20L career · no lines in 2024
3%93%4%
3.26
Judith Stewart
6W–8L career · no lines in 2024
16%83%<1%
3.14

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.